Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3]

2024-12-24 Thread Kim Barrett
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 02:34:16 GMT, Qizheng Xing wrote: >> This patch fixes unmatched brackets in some source files. > > Qizheng Xing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Revert fix in the CTW Makefile. Looks good. -

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3]

2024-12-24 Thread Qizheng Xing
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:42:34 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> I strongly suggest avoiding omnibus changes like this when possible (which it >> is here). Just because it's all about one "kind" of change doesn't make it a >> cohesive change. This is touching many distinct areas of the JDK, and several >>

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v3]

2024-12-24 Thread Qizheng Xing
> This patch fixes unmatched brackets in some source files. Qizheng Xing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Revert fix in the CTW Makefile. - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22861/files - new: https:

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Leonid Mesnik
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 22:22:28 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> Only this small piece would be appropriate for backport to 24. I suggest >> splitting this out into its own bug, >> fixing it in isolation, and backporting that. > > The purpose of this Makefile seems to be to build ctw.jar. So far as I ca

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Kim Barrett
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 03:26:23 GMT, Qizheng Xing wrote: >> This patch fixes unmatched brackets in some source files. > > Qizheng Xing has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Update `hotspot-unit-tests.md` and HTML (using Pandoc 2.

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Kim Barrett
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> Hmm, apparently this is not run as part of tier 1-3, which I ran in my >> patch. I wonder how this test is run. And it means this patch needs to be >> backported to 24. > > Only this small piece would be appropriate for backport to 24.

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Kim Barrett
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:45:24 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> I've tested this by running `make`, and the previous Makefile reports an >> error like file `test/lib/jtreg/SkippedException.java)` not found. So this >> fix is necessary. >> >> I also checked the git log, this change was introduced in >>

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 03:28:31 GMT, Qizheng Xing wrote: >> test/hotspot/jtreg/testlibrary/ctw/Makefile line 50: >> >>> 48: $(TESTLIBRARY_DIR)/jdk/test/lib/util \ >>> 49: $(TESTLIBRARY_DIR)/jtreg \ >>> 50: -maxdepth 1 -name '*.java') >> >> I wonder why this hasn't caused problems and b

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 03:26:23 GMT, Qizheng Xing wrote: >> This patch fixes unmatched brackets in some source files. > > Qizheng Xing has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Update `hotspot-unit-tests.md` and HTML (using Pandoc 2.

Re: RFR: 8346773: Fix unmatched brackets in source files [v2]

2024-12-24 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 03:26:23 GMT, Qizheng Xing wrote: >> This patch fixes unmatched brackets in some source files. > > Qizheng Xing has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Update `hotspot-unit-tests.md` and HTML (using Pandoc 2.

Re: RFR: 8343342: java/io/File/GetXSpace.java fails on Windows with CD-ROM drive [v8]

2024-12-24 Thread Taizo Kurashige
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:02:34 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > So I don't see any difference between a physical drive and a mounted ISO file > with respect to this test. I understood that the test fails on both the physical CD drive and the mounted ISO file. In my environment, testing with a mou