> For two cases:
>
> 1. When the ImageReaderFactory was loaded by local jdk,that means the
> ImageReaderFactory was loaded by boot class loader,then init the `Path
> BOOT_MODULES_JIMAGE` by using `sun.nio.fs.DefaultFileSystemProvider` which is
> obtained through reflection,due to it is in jdk i
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:40:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> using both at the same time could lead to strange conflicts between them
The gcc
[documentation](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html)
only mention that `-fsanitize=thread` could not use combined with
`-fsanitiz
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:40:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Does either asan or ubsan alone have this problem?
Use ubsan alone have this problem. And asan alone do not have this problem.
Here is mime configure command:
bash configure --with-jobs=128
--prefix=/home/yansendao/git/jdk/install-fastde
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:13:02 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> This is a clean backport of JDK-8345573 to the stabilization repo branch of
> JDK 24 GA.
Marked as reviewed by mchung (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22738#pullrequestreview-2503411481
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:07:53 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> In some circumstances ClassFileTransformer.transform can get
>> ClassCircularityError or LinkageError concatenating strings (see
>> JDK-8264667, JDK-8262002).
>> VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest fails sometimes on Oracle CI.
>> Th
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:10:53 GMT, Taizo Kurashige wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/File/GetXSpace.java line 415:
>>
>>> 413: private static native boolean isCDDrive(String root);
>>> 414:
>>> 415: private static long[] getCDDriveSpace(String root) throws
>>> IOException {
>>
>> Why not pass
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:32:14 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/SystemModulesPlugin.java
>> line 619:
>>
>>> 617: // generate dedup set fields and provider
>>> methods
>>> 618: var dedupSets = ge
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:24:33 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Henry Jen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Move up Snippet setup as a builder
>
> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/Snippets.java line 221:
>
>> 2
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:42:47 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Henry Jen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Move up Snippet setup as a builder
>
> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/SystemModulesPlugin.jav
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:22:04 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> The code has been refactored. The comment should be updated to reflect the
>> new code?
>
> Will do a pass in next commit, I want to see if this refactoring favorable.
Yes it does. Thanks for the update.
-
PR Review Comment:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:06:47 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/SystemModulesPlugin.java
>> line 1136:
>>
>>> 1134: /*
>>> 1135: * SetReference count references to the set, and use
>>> LoadableSet under the hood to
>
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:10:31 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Perhaps the output of `df` is not being parsed correctly?
Actually I am getting
df: 'D:': No such file or directory
as the first line returned by the process that runs `df` when I run the test in
Cygwin. On the command line this does
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 23:05:32 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Henry Jen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Move up Snippet setup as a builder
>
> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/plugins/SystemModulesPlugin.jav
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
> In some circumstances ClassFileTransformer.transform can get
> ClassCircularityError or LinkageError concatenating strings (see JDK-8264667,
> JDK-8262002).
> VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest fails sometimes on Oracle CI.
> The fix adds handling of the errors to get information for ana
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:51:10 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> In some circumstances ClassFileTransformer.transform can get
>> ClassCircularityError or LinkageError concatenating strings (see
>> JDK-8264667, JDK-8262002).
>> VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest fails sometimes on Oracle CI.
>> Th
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:54:05 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR which removes `(See below)` which was missed
> during the SQLPermission update as part of the updates for [JEP 486:
> Permanently Disable the Security Manager](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486)
>
> I have con
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:49:22 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> feedback
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/instrument/VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest.java
> line 259:
>
>> 257:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:30:19 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
>> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>>
>> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand
>> in the class
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 02:15:32 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Henry Jen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional commits
>> since
> In some circumstances ClassFileTransformer.transform can get
> ClassCircularityError or LinkageError concatenating strings (see JDK-8264667,
> JDK-8262002).
> VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest fails sometimes on Oracle CI.
> The fix adds handling of the errors to get information for ana
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:10:16 GMT, Taizo Kurashige wrote:
>> To resolve java/io/File/GetXSpace.java failure, I fix libGetXSpace.c to use
>> Cygwin’s `df` to get the size for comparison if the test target drive is a
>> CD-ROM drive.
>>
>> As described in JDK-8343342, GetDiskSpaceInformationW ca
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:10:22 GMT, Taizo Kurashige wrote:
>>> The native `GetXSpace` method needs to be defined on all platforms
>>
>> This change fixes that problem:
>>
>> --- a/test/jdk/java/io/File/libGetXSpace.c
>> +++ b/test/jdk/java/io/File/libGetXSpace.c
>> @@ -160,11 +160,11 @@ Java_GetX
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:21:42 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> In some circumstances ClassFileTransformer.transform can get
> ClassCircularityError or LinkageError concatenating strings (see JDK-8264667,
> JDK-8262002).
> VerifyLocalVariableTableOnRetransformTest fails sometimes on Oracle CI.
> The fix
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:45:27 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Can you try with add configure options `--enable-asan --enable-ubsan`
Does either asan or ubsan alone have this problem? I was under the impression
that using both at the same time could
lead to strange conflicts between them, but that's an
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:56:02 GMT, fabioromano1 wrote:
>> After changing `BigInteger.sqrt()` algorithm, this can be also used to speed
>> up `BigDecimal.sqrt()` implementation. Here is how I made it.
>>
>> The main steps of the algorithm are as follows:
>> first argument reduce the value to an in
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:54:05 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR which removes `(See below)` which was missed
> during the SQLPermission update as part of the updates for [JEP 486:
> Permanently Disable the Security Manager](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486)
>
> I have con
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:54:05 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR which removes `(See below)` which was missed
> during the SQLPermission update as part of the updates for [JEP 486:
> Permanently Disable the Security Manager](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486)
>
> I have con
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:21:49 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Can you add a `jep486` label to the bug? Otherwise, looks good.
Done, thank you Sean
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22739#issuecomment-2542244627
Please review this trivial PR which removes `(See below)` which was missed
during the SQLPermission update as part of the updates for [JEP 486:
Permanently Disable the Security Manager](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486)
I have confirmed there are no issues with the build via a macht tier1 run
---
> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>
> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand in
> the class builder. Here we have two approach, one is for dedup set,
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:15:11 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
>>
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:11:44 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> We have:
>> - `testLimitModules()` limits on a module from the module path, `m1`. It
>> expects `m1` and it's dependencies in the image.
>> - `testAddModules()` limits on a module dependency, but has modules from the
>> module path add
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:39:36 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/internal/JlinkTask.java line 441:
>>
>>> 439: // run-time image. Only do this if no --limit-modules
>>> has been
>>> 440: // specified to begin with.
>>> 441:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:15:11 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
>>
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:15:03 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > This method, in turn, calls `JLinkBundlerHelper.getDefaultModules()` which
> > uses `Configuration.empty().resolveAndBind()` which performs the service
> > binding.
>
> So it appears using `Configuration.empty().resolve()` instead wo
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:13:02 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> This is a clean backport of JDK-8345573 to the stabilization repo branch of
> JDK 24 GA.
Yes I agree.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22738#issuecomment-2541997686
On 12/13/2024 7:31 AM, Christian Stein wrote:
I'll update the message to read:
`META-INF/versions/9/com/foo/Bar.class has class file version 69 (Java 25), but
class file version 53 or less is required to target release 9 of the Java
Platform`
Saying "class file version 69" and "class file ver
> A jdk.VirtualPinnedEvent JFR event is recorded by Object::wait when a virtual
> thread waits in Object.wait while pinned. The posting of the event in
> ObjectMonitor::wait is done after waiting but it can block again in
> enter/ReenterI before it re-acquires. If that happens then the event dur
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:26:00 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> testObjectWait2 test already owns lock
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/MonitorPinnedEvents.java line 3
Hi Eirik,
The lack of `Boolean.getBoolean(String propName, boolean default)`
encourages
developers to roll their own. If it were easier get the desired default
from the built-in
boolean property API it would fit more use cases.
It might be a small step to take advantage of your analysis and b
> Please review this change ensuring all targeted classes in a MR-JAR file
> should target the same or a lower classfile version. The [JAR File
> Specification](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/jar/jar.html#Multi-release)
> of JavaSE 9 reads:
>
>> A class file under a versioned direc
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:09:09 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> A jdk.VirtualPinnedEvent JFR event is recorded by Object::wait when a virtual
> thread waits in Object.wait while pinned. The posting of the event in
> ObjectMonitor::wait is done after waiting but it can block again in
> enter/ReenterI b
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:14:13 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> This method, in turn, calls `JLinkBundlerHelper.getDefaultModules()` which
> uses `Configuration.empty().resolveAndBind()` which performs the service
> binding.
So it appears using `Configuration.empty().resolve()` instead would fix th
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:14:32 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Can you clarify how `jdk.jpackage` and `jdk.jlink` are included in
> `ALL-DEFAULT`? They do not have unqualified exports and hence they are not in
> the default set of root modules. They are service providers of
> `ToolProvider`. However,
> See the JBS bug for some details.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional
commits since the last revision
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:13:02 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> This is a clean backport of JDK-8345573 to the stabilization repo branch of
> JDK 24 GA.
@mlchung I'd like to bring this and #22494 to JDK 24 stabilization as well. OK
with you?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/p
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:57:52 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review this change ensuring all targeted classes in a MR-JAR file
> should target the same or a lower classfile version. The [JAR File
> Specification](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/jar/jar.html#Multi-release)
> of
> See the JBS bug for some details.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Removed repeated comment.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22737/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/p
Hi,
Another API alternative would be to add a version that triggers a lambda
on overflow and allow the caller to determine the value or throw.
public static long multiplyExact(long x,long y,LongBinaryOperator recompute) {
long r =x *y;
long ax =Math.abs(x);
long ay =Math.abs(y);
This is a clean backport of JDK-8345573 to the stabilization repo branch of JDK
24 GA.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 11cd639842b61952755ad83e88446c91237c19f5
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22738/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22738&range=00
Is
See the JBS bug for some details.
-
Commit messages:
- Refactoring some code and comments.
- 8343829: Unify decimal and hexadecimal parsing in FloatingDecimal
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22737/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22737&range=00
I
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:00:46 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> test/jdk/tools/jlink/basic/AllModulePath.java line 220:
>>
>>> 218: */
>>> 219: @Test
>>> 220: public void modulePathWithLimitMods() throws Exception {
>>
>> Is this test case different than `testLimitModules` which does
>
> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH`
> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In
> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and
> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier an
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:17:55 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 31 commits:
>>
>> - Guard test execution
>> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8345259-all-module-path-fix
>>
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:02:48 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
>>
>> - More test clean-ups
>> - Merge two AllModulePath tests
>> - Better error message with n
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:41:51 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
>>
>> - More test clean-ups
>> - Merge two AllModulePath tests
>> - Better error message with n
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:31:01 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to address the issue
>> reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345506?
>>
>> The `jar` tool has several operations which take `--file` as a parameter.
>> The value for tha
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:17:39 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to address the issue
> reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345506?
>
> The `jar` tool has several operations which take `--file` as a parameter. The
> value for that opt
Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to address the issue
reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345506?
The `jar` tool has several operations which take `--file` as a parameter. The
value for that option is a JAR file path. The `jar` operation is then run
against t
On 2024-12-12 23:58, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Question two: Am I losing the benefits of *Exact if I use the following
code to "pre-check" for overflow?
long high = Math.multiplyHigh(a, b);
if (high == 0) return Math.multiplyExact(a, b);
return bigIntegerMultiply(a, b);
For your spec
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:57:52 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review this change ensuring all targeted classes in a MR-JAR file
> should target the same or a lower classfile version. The [JAR File
> Specification](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/specs/jar/jar.html#Multi-release)
> of
A jdk.VirtualPinnedEvent JFR event is recorded by Object::wait when a virtual
thread waits in Object.wait while pinned. The posting of the event in
ObjectMonitor::wait is done after waiting but it can block again in
enter/ReenterI before it re-acquires. If that happens then the event duration
w
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:20:13 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Improve documentation for constant pool entries. This include some models
>> for those entries, symbolic descriptors, and some general guidance in
>> package summary.
>>
>> APIDiff: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/apidiff/cf-consts/
>> Java
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:35:11 GMT, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> In the past, the Graal Compiler used `sun.misc.Unsafe` but these usages were
>> recently changed to `jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe` [1]. We should therefor
>> export `jdk.internal.misc` to `jdk.graal.compiler` which is an upgradeable
>> mod
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:06:00 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
>>
>> - More test clean-ups
>> - Merge two AllModulePath tests
>> - Better error message with n
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:52:45 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
>>
>> - More test clean-ups
>> - Merge two AllModulePath tests
>> - Better error message with n
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:45:43 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/File/libGetXSpace.c line 165:
>>
>>> 163: #ifdef WINDOWS
>>> 164: JNIEXPORT jboolean JNICALL
>>> 165: Java_GetXSpace_isCDDrive
>>
>> The native `GetXSpace` method needs to be defined on all platforms,
>> otherwise we
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:20:51 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Taizo Kurashige has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add ifdef WINDOWS
>
> test/jdk/java/io/File/GetXSpace.java line 415:
>
>> 413: private static native boolea
> To resolve java/io/File/GetXSpace.java failure, I fix libGetXSpace.c to use
> Cygwin’s `df` to get the size for comparison if the test target drive is a
> CD-ROM drive.
>
> As described in JDK-8343342, GetDiskSpaceInformationW can't get information
> about the size of the CD-ROM drive.
> Ge
> To resolve java/io/File/GetXSpace.java failure, I fix libGetXSpace.c to use
> Cygwin’s `df` to get the size for comparison if the test target drive is a
> CD-ROM drive.
>
> As described in JDK-8343342, GetDiskSpaceInformationW can't get information
> about the size of the CD-ROM drive.
> Ge
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 15:42:33 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hello @sendaoYan, what exact version of `gcc` is this?
>
>> Hello @sendaoYan, what exact version of `gcc` is this?
>
> Hi, the gcc version is gcc14.2.0
>
>
>> gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/yanse
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 15:42:33 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hello @sendaoYan, what exact version of `gcc` is this?
>
>> Hello @sendaoYan, what exact version of `gcc` is this?
>
> Hi, the gcc version is gcc14.2.0
>
>
>> gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/yanse
> In the past, the Graal Compiler used `sun.misc.Unsafe` but these usages were
> recently changed to `jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe` [1]. We should therefor export
> `jdk.internal.misc` to `jdk.graal.compiler` which is an upgradeable module in
> the JDK.
>
> [1] Remove sun.misc.Unsafe plugins
> (ht
Hello,
as far as i remember, c2 is alble to transform a
try {
Math.somethingExact(...)
} catch(ArithmeticException e) {
...
}
to a jump on overflow ("jo") if the catch and the method call to
Math.somethingExact() are in the same inlining horizon.
If you want a garantee that this optimizat
80 matches
Mail list logo
