I submitted a patch that fixes a problemand you want to go back for your
ownmysterious reasons and you want meto discuss your demand! In additionyou do
not like my tone! As if I like yours!Also, I talked with the people
responsiblefor incorporating the patch and theyaccepted it. Now if they want
Hi Apostolos,
>
>
> Στις Παρ, 21 Δεκ, 2018 στις 14:26, ο χρήστηςRainer
> Orth έγραψε:
>
>> The reason for doing is TeXLive. "We"
>> provide both 32 and 64bit binaries. But
>> when you try to install the binaries, the
>> script always guesses that the system is
>> 32bit and never installs th
Hi Earnie,
>>> SOLARIS contains both 32 and 64bit binaries
>>> and libraries it does not mean this is correct.
>>
>> What do you mean by `correct'? It's perfectly correct to run 32-bit
>> binaries on a machine that is also capable of running 64-bit ones. In
>> fact, you'd be surprised that even
Hi Earnie,
[Guys, can you *pretty please* leave me on the Cc: for your replies?
I'm asking this for the third time now to no avail. I'm not subscribed
to config-patches and it's extremely tedious having a discussion when
you see some of the answers only by coincidence. Thanks.]
> On 12/20/2018
On 12/21/2018 8:26 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Apostolos,
[Again: *Please* leave config-patches on the Cc: It is hard to discuss
how best to proceed with your patch if you exclude everyone else from
the discussion. Thanks.]
Yes there is. Try to run a 64bit binary on
a 32bit machine. Also just
On 12/20/2018 4:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Apostolos,
[Please leave config-patches on the Cc: Thanks.]
Yes but I want this script to correctlydetect wheather I am using a 64 or
32bit system.Previously, the script "detected" that allSolaris systems are
32bit systems, somethingcompletely wron
Hi Apostolos,
[Again: *Please* leave config-patches on the Cc: It is hard to discuss
how best to proceed with your patch if you exclude everyone else from
the discussion. Thanks.]
> Yes there is. Try to run a 64bit binary on
>
> a 32bit machine. Also just because
No doubt about that. But how
Hi Apostolos,
[Please leave config-patches on the Cc: Thanks.]
> Yes but I want this script to correctlydetect wheather I am using a 64 or
> 32bit system.Previously, the script "detected" that allSolaris systems are
> 32bit systems, somethingcompletely wrong.
you seem to ignore or misunderstan
Earnie writes:
> On 12/19/2018 5:33 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> I've just investigated a GCC bug report about a comparison failure on
>> Solaris/SPARC:
>>
>> PR target/88535
>> sparcv9 gcc 7 causes comparison failure in sparc gcc 8 dwarf2out.o
>> https://gcc.gn
Hi Earnie,
> On 12/20/2018 4:20 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Apostolos,
>>
>>> If I understand correctly you do notlike the fact config.sub
>>> correctlyguesses that a system is 32 or 64bit?
>>
>> quite the contrary: if you boot a 64-bit kernel (the default since
>> Solaris 10/SPARC and Solaris 11
Hi Apostolos,
> If I understand correctly you do notlike the fact config.sub
> correctlyguesses that a system is 32 or 64bit?
quite the contrary: if you boot a 64-bit kernel (the default since
Solaris 10/SPARC and Solaris 11/x86), the *system* is *both* 32 and
64-bit. What's of interest to the b
On 12/20/2018 4:20 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Apostolos,
If I understand correctly you do notlike the fact config.sub
correctlyguesses that a system is 32 or 64bit?
quite the contrary: if you boot a 64-bit kernel (the default since
Solaris 10/SPARC and Solaris 11/x86), the *system* is *both* 3
On 12/20/2018 3:40 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
If I understand correctly you do not
like the fact config.sub correctly
guesses that a system is 32 or 64
bit?
I was saying no such thing. It is config.guess that does the guess and
config.sub does normalization of the given. And as the OP
On 12/19/2018 5:33 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Karl,
I've just investigated a GCC bug report about a comparison failure on
Solaris/SPARC:
PR target/88535
sparcv9 gcc 7 causes comparison failure in sparc gcc 8 dwarf2out.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88
Hi Karl,
As you likely already know, Ben Elliston is the maintainer of
config.{guess,sub}. (He's on this list.) So he's the one who will have
to make any changes. I never use Solaris myself and have no insight into
the issue. Everything you write sounds reasonable to me :). --best, karl.
___
Hi Karl,
I've just investigated a GCC bug report about a comparison failure on
Solaris/SPARC:
PR target/88535
sparcv9 gcc 7 causes comparison failure in sparc gcc 8 dwarf2out.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88535
where config.guess failed to notice that the
Hi Ben - I received a report that the current config.guess returns
i386-pc-solaris2.11 when it should be x86_64-pc-solaris2.11. See below
for details + possible patch. I don't know if it is possible to rely on
isainfo as the user suggests. But sure hope it can be fixed somehow.
--thanks, karl.
Dat
17 matches
Mail list logo
