Re: [PATCH] config.sub: Normalize arm64-* to aarch64-*

2020-07-09 Thread Ben Elliston
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:07:42PM -0400, John Ericson wrote: > I'll second that this is a good idea; Apple's "aarm64" has caused much > trouble and is wholly unnecessary as Keno says. > Also, If we apply this first, the previous email with the macOS > aarch64 config.guess support can be made mor

Re: [PATCH] config.sub: Normalize arm64-* to aarch64-*

2020-07-09 Thread Ben Elliston
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:02:02AM -0400, Keno Fischer wrote: > 2020-07-09 Keno Fischer > > * config.sub: Normalize arm64-* to aarch64-* Applied, many thanks. Ben signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] config.sub: Normalize arm64-* to aarch64-*

2020-07-09 Thread John Ericson
I'll second that this is a good idea; Apple's "aarm64" has caused much trouble and is wholly unnecessary as Keno says. Also, If we apply this first, the previous email with the macOS aarch64 config.guess support can be made more minimal. On 7/9/20 2:02 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: Apple tools use

[PATCH] config.sub: Normalize arm64-* to aarch64-*

2020-07-08 Thread Keno Fischer
Apple tools use arm64-* in their triples to indicate an aarch64 CPU. E.g. macOS 11.0 on aarch64 is `arm64-apple-darwin20.0.0`. That said, these tools do accept the `aarch64-*` just fine as well (LLVM normalizes internally). For config.sub, I think it makes sense to normalize arm64-* to aarch64-*, s