(CCOPTS="" $CC_FOR_BUILD -E - 2>/dev/null) | \
>grep IS_64BIT_ARCH >/dev/null
>then
>SUN_ARCH=sparcv9
>fi
>fi
>
> is the configure.ac script of GCC or some .m4 file or helper script used by
> this configure.ac script.
No, config.guess on Solaris/x86 has already used almost the same snippet
for years. It's quite confusing to users that config.guess on x86
produces a configure triplet depending on the compiler while no such
thing happens on sparc.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
em goes away.
All this was with older config.guess/config.sub already. To test it, I
just hacked that change into configure, dropped the current config.guess
and config.sub into build-aux and now all builds and tests of libffcall
2.1 pass for 32 and 64-bit Solaris/SPARC (gcc -m64 with no --build
opt
y also in binutils-gdb soon).
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
hing behaved as expected.
One thing I'm uncertain about is the need for testcases corresponding to
this change?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
201
both the tone and the content of your message clearly show that you're
beyond rational arguments. I'll leave the decision in this matter to
Ben and Karl.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
ike it's currently done for Solaris/x86, i.e. return
sparcv9-sun-solaris2.* when using a 64-bit compiler and
sparc-sun-solaris2.* for the 32-it case.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
config-patches mailing list
config-patches@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
> On 12/20/2018 4:46 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Apostolos,
>>
>> [Please leave config-patches on the Cc: Thanks.]
>>
>>> Yes but I want this script to correctlydetect wheather I am using a 64 or
>>> 32bit system.Previously, the script "detected&qu
causes massive problems especially but not only for the compiler
etc. toolchain and is just your personal preference, nothing more.
It has since been reverted in the config repo, and I'd like to ask Karl
to do the same in TeX Live.
Rainer
--
--
haven't answered my original question: what problem
prompted you to make this config.guess change? Without that
information, it's hard to decide what this is all about.
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Center
Earnie writes:
> On 12/19/2018 5:33 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> I've just investigated a GCC bug report about a comparison failure on
>> Solaris/SPARC:
>>
>> PR target/88535
>> sparcv9 gcc 7 causes comparison fa
Hi Earnie,
> On 12/20/2018 4:20 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Apostolos,
>>
>>> If I understand correctly you do notlike the fact config.sub
>>> correctlyguesses that a system is 32 or 64bit?
>>
>> quite the contrary: if you boot a 64-bit kernel (the
o -m32), you get the 32-bit triplet
instead. Your change lost that distinction.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
config-patc
know what drove Apostolos to his patch,
though, to understand which problem he was trying to solve.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
