Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-10 Thread Florian Weimer
* Arsen Arsenović via Gcc: > Bruno Haible writes: > >> Paul Eggert wrote: >>> I'd rather just switch, as Debian has. >> >> I'd go one step further, and not only >> make the ABI transition without changing the canonical triplet, >> but also >> make gcc and clang define -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -

Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-10 Thread Todd Vierling
> This is all nice and good, but I would actually like to focus on realistic > targets (ie., ones which could be achieved significantly before 2038... :o) Right — there are distro releases shipping over the next few years which will still be deployed in production in 2038, so the clock is actuall

Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-10 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2024, 01:08:36 CEST schrieb Arsen Arsenović: > Jacob Bachmeyer writes: > > >> At that point, we should bump SONAME of libc and simply remove 32-bit > >> time support. This would probably be okay generally. > > > > This is probably the best solution to this problem at h