Re: More recognizing NetBSD CPUs (Super-H, MIPS 64bit)

2019-01-04 Thread Ben Elliston
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:03:27AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > I am only interested in recognizing this case: > shl-unknown-netbsdelf8.99 Fixed in master. It was broken a while back when a bunch of structural cleanups were done by John Ericson. I believe it only worked before by chance. Cheers

Re: More recognizing NetBSD CPUs (Super-H, MIPS 64bit)

2019-01-04 Thread coypu
Hi Ben, I am only interested in recognizing this case: shl-unknown-netbsdelf8.99 The bug report to prompt me to make this change is: http://gnats.netbsd.org/53825 The reason 'shl' is used, is due to this normalization in config.guess: *:NetBSD:*:*) ... sh3el) machine=shl-unkn

Re: More recognizing NetBSD CPUs (Super-H, MIPS 64bit)

2019-01-04 Thread Ben Elliston
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 04:41:25PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > The notable difference is that "shl", chosen for netbsd/sh by > config.guess, is now recognised. > @@ -1230,8 +1230,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in > | riscv | riscv32 | riscv64 \ > | rl78 | rom