On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 03:22:57 PDT (-0700), rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:16:51 PDT (-0700), b...@air.net.au wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:24:41AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
>>2018-06-11 Palmer Dabbelt
>>
DJ's and Karsten's concerns match my config-for-target vs
config-for-toolchain distinction.
arm*- riscv-* and x86-* do make sense as compiler prefixes that indicate
toolchain support for a set of targets. But when we think of a toolchain
+ a set of standard libraries (without multilib), only a
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:17:45 PDT (-0700), d...@redhat.com wrote:
If by this patch you mean that "riscv-unknown-linux-gnu" means EITHER
riscv32 (when on a 32-bit os) OR riscv64 (when on a 64-bit os), then I
would prefer *against* this, as it would mean that config.guess would
return an ambigious v
2018-06-22 3:17 GMT+02:00 DJ Delorie :
>
> If by this patch you mean that "riscv-unknown-linux-gnu" means EITHER
> riscv32 (when on a 32-bit os) OR riscv64 (when on a 64-bit os), then I
> would prefer *against* this, as it would mean that config.guess would
> return an ambigious value - there is no
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:16:51 PDT (-0700), b...@air.net.au wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:24:41AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >
> >>2018-06-11 Palmer Dabbelt
> >>
> >>* config.sub: Add "riscv-*" as an alias for "riscv3
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:51:23AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is there some more context to this discussion I can read?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2018-06/index.html
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:16:51 PDT (-0700), b...@air.net.au wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:24:41AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >
> >>2018-06-11 Palmer Dabbelt
> >>
> >>* config.sub: Add "riscv-*" as an alias for "riscv3
