On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:40:30PM +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] * config.guess: Support MSVC compiler on Windows.
Why aren't you just running uname? There's no need to run a compiler
to determine the machine architecture.
Ben
__
Thanks!
/haubi/
>From 276322edfce1265e2567fcf20bbcc926f6dc97e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Haubenwallner
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:24:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] * config.guess: Support MSVC compiler on Windows.
On Windows, each POSIX-like subsystem or addon is able to run the native
MSV
Mojca Miklavec writes:
> > - The patch is complete: When you compile with "gcc -arch ppc64" you
> > get executables of type 'Mach-O 64-bit executable ppc64' but such
> > files are not directly executable on x86_64 Mac OS X 10.5.8:
> > $ ./a.out
> > -bash: ./a.out: Bad CPU type
Mojca Miklavec writes:
> I'm still slightly confused about something else in that case. In the
> past I always used
>
> CC=gcc
> CFLAGS="-arch ppc"
>
> when compiling for another architecture.
The GNU standards [1][2] don't give an answer to this, but the Autoconf manual
[3] does.
I rou
On 19 April 2017 at 03:52, Bruno Haible wrote:
> The patch looks good to me:
Thank you.
> - The patch is complete: When you compile with "gcc -arch ppc64" you
> get executables of type 'Mach-O 64-bit executable ppc64' but such
> files are not directly executable on x86_64 Mac OS X 10.5.
