32-bit and x32 user-space environments may be running under Linux/x86-64
kernel. Using "uname -m" isn't sufficient to properly detect the
canonical system name for 32-bit and x32 user-space environments. This
patch checks if compiler is configured for 64-bit, 32-bit or x32 objects
under Linux/x86
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:49:43AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:17:43AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> 32-bit and x32 user-space environments may be running under Linux/x86-64
> >> kernel. Using "uname -m" isn't sufficien
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:17:43AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> 32-bit and x32 user-space environments may be running under Linux/x86-64
> kernel. Using "uname -m" isn't sufficient to properly detect the
> canonical system name for 32-bit and x32 user-space environments. This
> patch checks if compile
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Tested with 64-bit, 32-bit and x32 user-space environments under
> Linux/x86-64 kernel. I am not sure if this will ever be accepted in
> upstream since the config.guess maintainer doesn't want to add a new
> use of set_cc_for_build to config.guess. set_cc_fo
On 23 Feb 2015 05:29, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> >> There are 12 existing set_cc_for_build usages in config.guess. I
> >> don't think it is reasonable to require x32 not to use it without
> >> providing an alternative. If you want to remove set_cc_for
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:49:43AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:17:43AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> 32-bit and x32 user-space environments may be running under
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2015-02-23 14:29, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
There are 12 existing set_cc_for_build usages in config.guess. I
don't think it is reasonable to require x32 not to use it withou
On Monday 2015-02-23 14:29, H.J. Lu wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
>>> There are 12 existing set_cc_for_build usages in config.guess. I
>>> don't think it is reasonable to require x32 not to use it without
>>> providing an alternative. If you want to remove set_cc_
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> There are 12 existing set_cc_for_build usages in config.guess. I
>> don't think it is reasonable to require x32 not to use it without
>> providing an alternative. If you want to remove set_cc_for_build,
>> one extra usage doesn't make it mu
