abhioncbr commented on PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#issuecomment-2452698588
We will wait for http5-client 5.4.2 version, to check if the fix is there
for Http1.1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#issuecomment-2436122218
For reference: [5.4 release
note](https://downloads.apache.org/httpcomponents/httpclient/RELEASE_NOTES-5.4.x.txt)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
Jackie-Jiang commented on code in PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#discussion_r1815521655
##
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/http/MultiHttpRequest.java:
##
@@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ public
CompletionService completionService = new
Execut
abhioncbr commented on PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#issuecomment-2436418018
> This is the highlighted release note, not sure if related to the issue we
encountered:
>
> ```
> IMPORTANT! The new cache entry serialization format is incompatible with
ear
Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#issuecomment-2436124636
This is the highlighted release note, not sure if related to the issue we
encountered:
```
IMPORTANT! The new cache entry serialization format is incompatible with
earlier
v
abhioncbr commented on PR #14191:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14191#issuecomment-2435352441
> Thanks for debugging this!
>
> Can you elaborate more on the root cause? Since the bug was fixed in the
new version, why would our test fail? Is there extra overhead if we do no
