richardstartin commented on PR #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8818#issuecomment-1154392815
Just circling back here having taken a quick look at
`BenchmarkFuseRegexp.decreasing9Fusing` - I got similar results to Gonzalo:
```
Benchmark (
richardstartin commented on PR #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8818#issuecomment-1154343989
> > > > > Thanks @atris for taking a look. I also have a question around how
Lucene and native FST handle the query, specifically for these results:
> > > > > ```
> > > > > SELE
richardstartin commented on PR #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8818#issuecomment-1154336975
> > > Thanks @atris for taking a look. I also have a question around how
Lucene and native FST handle the query, specifically for these results:
> > > ```
> > > SELECT INT_COL F
richardstartin commented on PR #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8818#issuecomment-1154277210
> Thanks @atris for taking a look. I also have a question around how Lucene
and native FST handle the query, specifically for these results:
>
> ```
> SELECT INT_COL FROM My
richardstartin commented on PR #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8818#issuecomment-1145814759
I don’t believe the native FST supports backreferences, and I don’t think it
would be easy to add support either. Not sure about the lucene FST index. As
mentioned above, LIKE statem
