Re: [I] Issues with min/max over big_decimal field when using Multi-stage engine [pinot]

2024-03-23 Thread via GitHub
dorlevi commented on issue #12705: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12705#issuecomment-2016684549 Ideally it would support all the types that other calcite compatible DBs would accept - All numeric data types - All date/time types - String data types: -- This i

Re: [I] Issues with min/max over big_decimal field when using Multi-stage engine [pinot]

2024-03-23 Thread via GitHub
Jackie-Jiang commented on issue #12705: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12705#issuecomment-2016683295 v2 is strong typed, and currently `min()` takes `double` as input and return `double`, that is why it failed in v2. Ideally `min()` should be able to directly take `big_decimal`

[I] Ingest from Pulsar: relying on/is compatible to EOL version of Pulsar [pinot]

2024-03-23 Thread via GitHub
hpvd opened a new issue, #12713: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12713 Ingest from Pulsar: relying on/is compatible to EOL version of Pulsar Details: Pinot ingest streaming from pulsar currently relies on Pulsar client version 2.7.2 https://docs.pinot.apache.org/bas

Re: [I] Retention manager not running for all tables [pinot]

2024-03-23 Thread via GitHub
vineethvp commented on issue #12660: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/12660#issuecomment-2016536852 Hi @Jackie-Jiang Yes the table is queryable. previously when i checked ,i was creating an error when running retention manager because mismatch in timestamp granularity. I have de

(pinot) annotated tag release-1.1.0-rc deleted (was b074f361cc)

2024-03-23 Thread vvivekiyer
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. vvivekiyer pushed a change to annotated tag release-1.1.0-rc in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/pinot.git *** WARNING: tag release-1.1.0-rc was deleted! *** tag was b074f361cc This change permanently discard