squakez closed issue #5000: Failing to build native integration
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscri
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864782870
Yes, as I suspected it's a runtime issue. Try to verify if it is related to
groovy DSL or if it's a generic problem, thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864779355
I ran another test with runtimeVersion set to 3.2.0 and the results were
impressive:
```
[1/8] Initializing...
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864768222
Cool, thanks for the info. It gives us the root cause why it's taking
actually the double of time. It seems indeed there are the double of classes to
scan. Now, I really cannot say i
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864757645
Sure, here it is:
```
[2/8] Performing analysis... [***]
(554.8s @ 8.30GB)
43,191 (95.52%) of 45,216 typ
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864697231
BTW, would you mind publishing the entire log trace of the analysis? so we
can get some comparison and see how much more classes are scanned.
--
This is an automated message from t
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864694794
What I can tell is that since version 2.2.0 we're using Camel 4.2.0 as a
default and I recall the groovy dependencies moved to a different project. I
don't know if it relates, but su
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864646824
Sorry, I have no idea. We are experiencing the same slowness and I can tell
in general it is taking more resources than before. You may engage with Camel
Quarkus team or directly wit
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864643342
With a new attempt it ran further and was able to generate the image
Here is a summary of the step durations:
```
[1/8] Initializing...
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864607428
You're right. Just found the timeout message in the operator log:
`{"level":"info","ts":"2023-12-20T14:44:24Z","logger":"camel-k.controller.build","msg":"Build
error","request-na
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864532976
I managed to build it correctly with your same configuration:
```
camel-k-kit-cm1f44plflrc73dahicg-builder quarkus-native [1/8]
Initializing...
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864393513
In theory it should as there is quite some memory. I'll try to replicate
locally with your same Integration.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864389850
@squakez I tried tuning the builder by adding the traits:
```
traits:
quarkus:
buildMode:
- native
builder:
properties:
-
squakez commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864381370
Yeah, we noticed lately that Quarkus native builds are requiring around 30%
of memory more than before. See #4999 - you need to fine tune the builder
configuration and provide a set
lsergio commented on issue #5000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/5000#issuecomment-1864364848
For comparison purposes, I repeated the process with Camel K 2.1.0 and the
build proceeded further, but still failed, as the log shows:
```
15 matches
Mail list logo
