barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1170653027
@squakez yes pls take a look #3408
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1166262856
Although Buildah is perfectly fine with regards to building kit images, when
Istio auto-injection is enabled, the camel-k builder always wait for the Istio
container to complete (whic
barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1153423559
Ah I see, great! However it uses Graal. Don't know what the difference
between mandrel and graal so I'm waiting for the official release :) For now
everything works for me and I don't
barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1153055380
Confirm that the PR works!
Now my integrations are arm64, yeah! Saw ~4x performance on my mac :)
I'll still using my local arm64 quarkus-mandrel image though, didn't find
the man
barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1153032492
>
Okay I'll try it! Good work!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
barius commented on issue #1238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1238#issuecomment-1152954191
I'm able to build a arm64 camel-k-operator image by first creating a arm64
quarkus-mandel image, then base camel-k on this.
However, integration kits built in this arm64 operator is
