[code-quality] Possible to make extensions subdirectory a separate package?

Hi! I think that making contents of proposed extensions subdirectory a separate package from pylint itself would be a great convenience for users who may not be ready to update to most recent version of pylint, but are interested in some optional checker. Please let me know what you think. Thank

Re: [code-quality] Possible to make extensions subdirectory a separate package?

On Dec 4, 2014 3:19 PM, "Anne Mulhern" wrote: > > Hi! > > I think that making contents of proposed extensions subdirectory a separate > package from pylint itself would be a great convenience for users who may > not be ready to update to most recent version of pylint, but are interested > in some

Re: [code-quality] Advice regarding caching values as a side-effect of visiting classes

Thanks! I ended up getting less ambitious with the analysis, but the definition of close() method in Misdesign checker seemed like a good working example to start with. - mulhern - Original Message - > From: "Torsten Marek" > To: "Anne Mulhern" > Cc: "code-quality" > Sent: Friday, Nov

[code-quality] Time cost for pylint analyses?

Hi! Would it be possible to be able to extend pylint somehow to record a time cost for individual pylint analyses? - mulhern ___ code-quality mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality