Re: [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc12

2012-04-11 Thread Mansour Moufid
Hello, Even with --enable-python, rc12 doesn't install coccilib (on Debian). rc11 works fine. Am I forgetting something? On 2012-04-08, at 12:48 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > Version 1.0.0-rc12 has been released. There have been significant changes to > the makefile and to the management of exter

Re: [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc12: Further fine-tuning for the build system?

2012-04-11 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:01 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> There have been significant changes to the makefile and to the management >> of external libraries. > > > I am surprised that the autotools build system was introduced for your > software. > https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/

Re: [Cocci] 1.0.0-rc12: Further fine-tuning for the build system?

2012-04-11 Thread SF Markus Elfring
There have been significant changes to the makefile and to the management of external libraries. I am surprised that the autotools build system was introduced for your software. https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/feec80c30d140c69f5d894bd09b6071247d0fbaa/configure.ac Would you like to

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 11-04-12 10:38, Nicolas Palix wrote: For the Ubuntu PPA, I updated the build dependencies so that every feature of Coccinelle is enabled: ocaml scripting, python and PCRE. However, in a previous attempt to build the packages, I got an error from the fake-subst script about pkg-config. https:

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Jim Cromie
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Arie Middelkoop >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11-04-12 07:07, Julia Lawall wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: > > > the distro version o

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Julia Lawall
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Arie Middelkoop wrote: On 11-04-12 07:07, Julia Lawall wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: the distro version on fedora is working, as is Nicolas Palix's package for ubuntu. The "apparent" difference is PCRE

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Jim Cromie
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Arie Middelkoop wrote: > On 11-04-12 07:07, Julia Lawall wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: >>> >>> the distro version on fedora is working, as is Nicolas Palix's package >>> for ubuntu. >>> The "apparent" difference is PCRE support, though that do

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Nicolas Palix
Hi all, > > Finally, about the regexp support. Apparently, libpcre was not detected by > configure otherwise it would have been enabled (check perhaps config.log). > Does 'pkg-config --list-all' show 'pcre' somewhere? Or, in case that you > don't have pkg-config, does '/usr/include/pcre.h' exist?

Re: [Cocci] -in_place appears to be broken in -rc12 vanilla config

2012-04-11 Thread Arie Middelkoop
On 11-04-12 07:07, Julia Lawall wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Jim Cromie wrote: the distro version on fedora is working, as is Nicolas Palix's package for ubuntu. The "apparent" difference is PCRE support, though that doesnt seem very pertinent. Did one come from a fedora package and the other f