Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

ake@cmake.org >Subject: [CMake] Xcode generator problems > >Hi all, > >I just opened https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/16260, anyone >have ideas how to work around it ? Or if it is fixed in latest & greatest >CMake ? > >Regards >/Robert >-- > >Powe

[CMake] Xcode generator problems

Hi all, I just opened https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/16260, anyone have ideas how to work around it ? Or if it is fixed in latest & greatest CMake ? Regards /Robert -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wik

Re: [CMake] XCode generator and .metal shader files

Thanks for a tip, Cmake generates correct project with regard to shaders if I set LANGUAGE to METAL set_source_files_properties(${MetalTriangle_SHADERS} PROPERTIES LANGUAGE METAL) On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Gregor Jasny wrote: > Hello, > > On 22/07/16 23:07, Victor Rykov wrote: > > After

Re: [CMake] XCode generator and .metal shader files

Hello, On 22/07/16 23:07, Victor Rykov wrote: > After adding a .metal file to a target via add_executable the metal file > does not get pushed to the generated project`s Compile Sources queue and > subsequently does not compile during project build unless I add the file to > the queue manually fro

[CMake] XCode generator and .metal shader files

Hi, After adding a .metal file to a target via add_executable the metal file does not get pushed to the generated project`s Compile Sources queue and subsequently does not compile during project build unless I add the file to the queue manually from Xcode, I`ve tried setting compile flags on the .

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator results in a project file without optimization

OK, I got it. It worked all the time, but I looked at the wrong scheme/target. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote: > On 11/05/16 08:40, Siyuan Ren wrote: >> Attached are a minimal demonstration and a screenshot of what Xcode >> shows me when it opens the project. > > This also wo

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator results in a project file without optimization

On 10/05/16 01:52, Siyuan Ren wrote: > Version 7.3.1 (7D1014) Could you please share your build and source directory with me? -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator results in a project file without optimization

est.cpp) >> ``` >> >> Then generate the Xcode project file with `cmake -G Xcode .`. Open the >> project file in Xcode, and I found the optimization level on all kinds >> of build, including "Debug", "Release", "RelWithDebInfo", >> &quo

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator results in a project file without optimization

ct file in Xcode, and I found the optimization level on all kinds > of build, including "Debug", "Release", "RelWithDebInfo", > "MinSizeRel", to be "None (-O0)". > > Do I do something wrong? Or CMake Xcode generator cannot even h

[CMake] Xcode generator results in a project file without optimization

Debug", "Release", "RelWithDebInfo", "MinSizeRel", to be "None (-O0)". Do I do something wrong? Or CMake Xcode generator cannot even handle the simplest project right? -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator ignores shared library made of object libraries

Hello Pere, On 09/03/15 12:59, Pere Mato Vila wrote: I am using cmake version 3.1.3 on MacOSX 10.10.2. I want to build a SHARED library made exclusively of OBJECT libraries. This works well with the Makefile generator but fails with the Xcode generator. To reproduce the problem is very s

[CMake] Xcode generator ignores shared library made of object libraries

Hi, I am using cmake version 3.1.3 on MacOSX 10.10.2. I want to build a SHARED library made exclusively of OBJECT libraries. This works well with the Makefile generator but fails with the Xcode generator. To reproduce the problem is very simple: cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8.8 FATAL_E

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator per architecture setting

Bin Chen wrote > Hi, > > For Xcode generator, is it possible to specify CFLAGS for each > architecture, e.g. i386 and x86_64? Thanks! > > Best regards, > Bin Chen I used to set set_target_properties(${DRM_TARGET_NAME} PROPERTIES XCODE_ATTRIBUTE_OTHER_CFLAGS[arch=${_NATIVE_ARCH}] "${MY_OTHER_CFLA

[CMake] Xcode generator per architecture setting

Hi, For Xcode generator, is it possible to specify CFLAGS for each architecture, e.g. i386 and x86_64? Thanks! Best regards, Bin Chen Notice: This message and any included attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain information

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator : is it commonly used ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Nicholas Yue wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using CMake for a couple of years on the Windows, Linux > and OS X platform. (c++ development) > > In the last 12 months or so, I have found that I can no longer > generate usable XCode files, I have been monitoring

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator : is it commonly used ?

On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 07:26:44 +1000, Nicholas Yue said: > I am currently on OS X 10.7 and am wondering if there are other >developer on the same OS version and XCode 4.4.1 and have success with >that tool chain and hope to learn the correct work flow since the >changes at Apple with the move

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator : is it commonly used ?

On 9/2/2013 5:26 PM, Nicholas Yue wrote: Hi, I have been using CMake for a couple of years on the Windows, Linux and OS X platform. (c++ development) In the last 12 months or so, I have found that I can no longer generate usable XCode files, I have been monitoring the situation and tr

[CMake] Xcode generator : is it commonly used ?

Hi, I have been using CMake for a couple of years on the Windows, Linux and OS X platform. (c++ development) In the last 12 months or so, I have found that I can no longer generate usable XCode files, I have been monitoring the situation and trying to determine what I have change or

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator fails to heed add_custom_command() DEPENDS

On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 19:35 +, David Cole wrote: > > DEPENDS ${targetname} > > Instead of using a targetname here in the add_custom_command call, use > a file name. That’s known to work with the Xcode generator. (I > think... it’s been a while since I did it personally using Xcode, but >

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

On 05/01/2012 01:56, David Cole wrote: >> Wow. Nice, quick work. >> > >> > Thanks for the patch. I'll get it applied and pushed to our 'next' >> > branch so this can get into the next release... >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > David > Hmmm. I've downloaded the source from SourceForge, but do not > repr

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

On 4.1.2012. 17:05, David Cole wrote: What project are you running through CMake? Is it available for us to try to reproduce here? I've not heard of anything like this... Actually we've been bitten by this also: ever since 2.8.6 CMake would hang in the generate phase on OS X. However it only

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:14 PM, David Cole wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Axel Roebel wrote: >> On 4/1/12 5:05 PM, David Cole wrote: >>> What project are you running through CMake? Is it available for us to >>> try to reproduce here? >> >> It is the SDIF/EASDIF_SDIF project that is on

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Axel Roebel wrote: > On 4/1/12 5:05 PM, David Cole wrote: >> What project are you running through CMake? Is it available for us to >> try to reproduce here? > > It is the SDIF/EASDIF_SDIF project that is on sourceforge. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif/files/

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

On 4/1/12 5:05 PM, David Cole wrote: > What project are you running through CMake? Is it available for us to > try to reproduce here? It is the SDIF/EASDIF_SDIF project that is on sourceforge. http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif/files/Easdif/ > I've not heard of anything like this... Thanks for

Re: [CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

What project are you running through CMake? Is it available for us to try to reproduce here? I've not heard of anything like this... Can you use Activity Monitor to inspect the process and grab a sample showing a call stack of what's happening when it's "hung"? Does CMake have any child processe

[CMake] XCode generator hangs when writing build config.

Hello I just upgraded from 2.8.1 to 2.8.6 to be able to use the recently added generator expressions in add_custom_command. Unfortunately, whenever I try to generate a project for Xcode (Mac OSX 10.6.8, Xcode 3.2.6) the project generator (command line as well as gui) hangs in the last phase when i

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator linker flags

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > > On 14. Jan, 2010, at 16:46 , Michael Wild wrote: > > > > > On 14. Jan, 2010, at 16:18 , Michael Wild wrote: > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> I think that the Xcode generate is buggy as the linker flags are not > inherited from the compile flags a

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator linker flags

On 14. Jan, 2010, at 16:46 , Michael Wild wrote: > > On 14. Jan, 2010, at 16:18 , Michael Wild wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I think that the Xcode generate is buggy as the linker flags are not >> inherited from the compile flags as they do in the Unix Makefile generator. >> Is this known/fixed/i

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator linker flags

On 14. Jan, 2010, at 16:18 , Michael Wild wrote: > Hi all > > I think that the Xcode generate is buggy as the linker flags are not > inherited from the compile flags as they do in the Unix Makefile generator. > Is this known/fixed/intentional or should I report a bug? > > Michael Setting CMA

[CMake] Xcode generator linker flags

Hi all I think that the Xcode generate is buggy as the linker flags are not inherited from the compile flags as they do in the Unix Makefile generator. Is this known/fixed/intentional or should I report a bug? Michael ___ Powered by www.kitware.com V

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

On Friday 17 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote: ... > As a final request (again, to avoid going off-topic), I would really > appreciate it if you could reference me to any reading materials on this > subject. Here's a full book on linkers and loaders: http://www.akae.cn/study/ebook/computerscience/

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

Robert Dailey wrote: Thanks for explaining Bill. What you've just explained is very confusing to me. What I'm trying to do is investigate CMake a bit more so we can get it working for the iPhone. However, what you've just brought up I still have a few more questions about but to ask them would

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Robert Dailey wrote: > >> What do you mean "specified order"? Why does the order of static libraries >> matter? And also what do you mean by "repeats"? >> > Linkers on unix (including apple) require that the order of static > libraries be spec

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

Robert Dailey wrote: What do you mean "specified order"? Why does the order of static libraries matter? And also what do you mean by "repeats"? Linkers on unix (including apple) require that the order of static libraries be specified in order of symbol usage. Sometimes this requires a libra

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Robert Dailey wrote: > >> I actually have another question about the Xcode generator. I didn't want >> to create another thread for this. >> >> A co worker and myself noticed that the generated Xcode projects for MAC >> seem to be nothing more

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

Robert Dailey wrote: I actually have another question about the Xcode generator. I didn't want to create another thread for this. A co worker and myself noticed that the generated Xcode projects for MAC seem to be nothing more than utility projects that call into makefile scripts. Is this tru

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

I actually have another question about the Xcode generator. I didn't want to create another thread for this. A co worker and myself noticed that the generated Xcode projects for MAC seem to be nothing more than utility projects that call into makefile scripts. Is this true? Why is CMake not generat

Re: [CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

On Thursday 09 April 2009, you wrote: ... > I haven't done this yet, so correct me if I'm wrong. I suspect that > creating the xcode project for either is identical except for a view > varying things, such as library include directories, compiler flags, > preprocessor directives, etc. See my other

Re: [CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf > On Thursday 09 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote: > > 2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf > ... > > > Does Xcode support this out of the box ? > > > > Support *what* outside of the box? If you're talking about cross > compiling, > > then yes. It just uses GCCE, which itself i

Re: [CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

On Thursday 09 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote: > 2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf ... > > Does Xcode support this out of the box ? > > Support *what* outside of the box? If you're talking about cross compiling, > then yes. It just uses GCCE, which itself is a cross compiler. That's interesting. How d

Re: [CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

2009/4/9 Alexander Neundorf > > This is cross compiling, right ? Yes. You compile the ARM code for the device on a different platform. For example, on Windows I'd compile the ARM application and then transfer that binary to the device to be executed. > Does Xcode support this out of the box ?

Re: [CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

On Thursday 09 April 2009, Robert Dailey wrote: > For the Boost library, we have compiled it for both the iPhone device and > iPhone simulator. However, I'm not sure how to tell the difference between > the two from CMake when we have xcode as our generator. Perhaps there is a > way I can generate

[CMake] iPhone development with CMake (xcode generator)

For the Boost library, we have compiled it for both the iPhone device and iPhone simulator. However, I'm not sure how to tell the difference between the two from CMake when we have xcode as our generator. Perhaps there is a way I can generate multiple xcode configurations for both the device and th

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator

On 2 Apr 2009, at 02:14, E. Wing wrote: As you can see, when a rebuild is done, the template gets copied to "main.cpp" which in turn is compiled and linked. This works great in Xcode. But, whenever I change the template, i.e. my CUDA sources, I have to run the build twice to make the changes ap

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator

> As you can see, when a rebuild is done, the template gets copied to > "main.cpp" which in turn is compiled and linked. This works great in > Xcode. But, whenever I change the template, i.e. my CUDA sources, I > have to run the build twice to make the changes appear in the test > program. It looks

[CMake] Xcode generator

Hi All, I have a problem with compiled CUDA source code and the Xcode generator. The behavior can be demonstrated using this simple example: I have a file called "main.template": #include int main() { std::cout << "Hello world!\n"; return 0; } my CMakeLists.txt looks like

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

Robert Dailey wrote: Thanks David. Where can I find a platform-ambiguous version of the documentation then? There really is not any for this... cmake --help Will give you the generators available for your particular cmake. -Bill ___ Powered by ww

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

Thanks David. Where can I find a platform-ambiguous version of the documentation then? On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:35 PM, David Cole wrote: > (And the "official list" you pointed to is generated by a Windows build of > CMake) > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Cole wrote: > >> It's n

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

(And the "official list" you pointed to is generated by a Windows build of CMake) On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:34 PM, David Cole wrote: > It's name is "Xcode" and it's only available on the Mac build of CMake. > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Robert Dailey wrote: > >> What is the xcode gen

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator?

It's name is "Xcode" and it's only available on the Mac build of CMake. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Robert Dailey wrote: > What is the xcode generator name on the command line? I don't see it in the > official list of > generators

[CMake] Xcode generator?

What is the xcode generator name on the command line? I don't see it in the official list of generators . ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http:

Re: [CMake] xcode generator

I just generated an Xcode project for one of my own projects that uses boost and the OP is correct, code completion doesn't seem to work for boost. Odd. Fortunately I use Eclipse CDT for C++ instead of Xcode which seems to work reasonably well on OS X. At least I get boost code completi

Re: [CMake] xcode generator

I do not know about Xcode, but Visual Studio code completion depends on the header files being added to the project files. Are the headers in question included in the project file? Do you have an example non-CMake generated Xcode project that demonstrates code completion working with boost headers?

Re: [CMake] xcode generator

On 3/24/09 10:20 AM, Doug Henry said: >Quick question about the cmake xcode project generator. I can run cmake and >build my project just fine using cmake under Leopard from the terminal and >from xcode, so there is no build problem. I was wondering if anyone has >code completion working for the

[CMake] xcode generator

Quick question about the cmake xcode project generator. I can run cmake and build my project just fine using cmake under Leopard from the terminal and from xcode, so there is no build problem. I was wondering if anyone has code completion working for their project? To be more specific, when usin

[CMake] XCode generator issues for XIB files and project file version

Hello folks, recently I have been focusing on using cmake to generate Xcode project files for building iPhone software. Things have been going very well proving once again the power of cmake. I did encounter two issues in Xcode project file generation both of which I have filed as issues complete w

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator issues

The issue is that the build system for boost does NOT set an "install_name", a path embedded in the library that executables can use to find the library after linking. You have a few choices at this point. 1) Hack boost's build system to add in the correct "install_name" 2) Manually use "in

[CMake] Xcode generator issues

I am trying to use boost to generate an xcode project file. I have boost properly installed in that I can use it manually, generate Makefiles, and the relevant FindBoost variables are appropriately set, both of which run fine. The problem is that I get the error and SIGTRAP: dyld: Libra

Re: [CMake] XCode generator and cross-compilation

On Friday 25 July 2008, Emmanuel Blot wrote: > > Until now only the makefile-based generators have been tested for > > cross > > compiling. XCode probably doesn't work. I have no idea how hard it > > would be > > to support cross compiling with XCode. > > Ok. I've tried to find some information abo

Re: [CMake] XCode generator and cross-compilation

Until now only the makefile-based generators have been tested for cross compiling. XCode probably doesn't work. I have no idea how hard it would be to support cross compiling with XCode. Ok. I've tried to find some information about supporting cross compilation w/ Xcode, but it's far from

Re: [CMake] XCode generator and cross-compilation

On Friday 25 July 2008, Emmanuel Blot wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to use the Xcode generator to produce Xcode projects > for cross-compilation? > It seems that in such a case, CMake ignores the cross-compiler (gcc > 4.x), which in turn make Xcode use the native GCC compiler. Until now only the

[CMake] XCode generator and cross-compilation

Hi, Is it possible to use the Xcode generator to produce Xcode projects for cross-compilation? It seems that in such a case, CMake ignores the cross-compiler (gcc 4.x), which in turn make Xcode use the native GCC compiler. Thanks, Manu ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

On Thursday 14 December 2006 18:03, Sean McBride wrote: > On 2006-12-14 14:40, Axel Roebel said: > >I would suggest to change this order in cmake > >because having debug as default in a software > >distribution seems not so appropriate given that you > >cannot assume that all people that may downlo

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

On 2006-12-14 14:40, Axel Roebel said: >I would suggest to change this order in cmake >because having debug as default in a software >distribution seems not so appropriate given that you >cannot assume that all people that may download >and compile your software with Xcode are >really knowing wha

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

Axel Roebel wrote: I am not using Xcode myself but a very brief look into the cmake source reveals that the variable CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES is used instead of CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE. Now the default value for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES is "Debug;Release;MinSizeRel;RelWithDebInfo". Simply setti

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

It is not order dependent. If you have a solution/project that has Debug and Release configs only, then MSVC *always* chooses Debug by default the first time such a solution is opened... Changing the order does not change that behavior. I've tried... The "ncb" file is actually the cache of "non-

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

On Wednesday 13 December 2006 19:57, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Sean McBride wrote: > > On 2006-12-13 18:27, Axel Roebel said: > >> Everything works fine for unix makefiles (on Linux and Mac OS X) > >> > >> Now, we tried the Xcode generator and we am having > >> some minor problems with it. > >> > >> 1)

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

Bill Hoffman wrote: > Actually, it is not stored in the solution file. It is stored in the > .ncb file. This is a binary file, that we do not know the format of. Ah... I see, but... If I am not mistaken, the MS IDE *has* to select some configuration as the default when a project is loaded. I wou

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

gga wrote: Bill Hoffman wrote: With MS IDE, there is no way for us to change the default build type in one of the files we can generate. Hmm... That's probably not right. Not sure about X code, but the MSVC IDE most definitively saves out what's the default build whenever you create

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

Bill Hoffman wrote: > With MS IDE, there is no way for > us to change the default build type in one of the files we can > generate. Hmm... That's probably not right. Not sure about X code, but the MSVC IDE most definitively saves out what's the default build whenever you create a project from t

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

Sean McBride wrote: On 2006-12-13 18:27, Axel Roebel said: Everything works fine for unix makefiles (on Linux and Mac OS X) Now, we tried the Xcode generator and we am having some minor problems with it. 1) It appears that the default build style in the Xcode project is set to debug whil

Re: [CMake] Xcode Generator

On 2006-12-13 18:27, Axel Roebel said: >Everything works fine for unix makefiles (on Linux and Mac OS X) > >Now, we tried the Xcode generator and we am having >some minor problems with it. > >1) >It appears that the default build style in the Xcode project is >set to debug while for my makefile bu

[CMake] Xcode Generator

Hi we are working on a release for our SDIF library (http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif) which should for the first time use cmake instead of autotools as its configuration system. Everything works fine for unix makefiles (on Linux and Mac OS X) Now, we tried the Xcode generator and we am hav

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

On Monday 01 May 2006 23:05, you wrote: > At 03:12 PM 5/1/2006, Axel Roebel wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I just tried to generate Xcode project files for some of my > >cmake supported sources. I encountered three problems: > > > >1) I tried to communicate -framework Carbon flags > >to the link stage. I tr

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

On Wednesday 03 May 2006 16:08, you wrote: > Axel Roebel wrote: > > Thanks, in fact I found the problem! > > It is due to the repeated call of CollapseFullPath ("") which is used to > > determine the current absolute path cmDependsC.cxx > > for each dependency file with absolute path. > > > > This

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

Axel Roebel wrote: Thanks, in fact I found the problem! It is due to the repeated call of CollapseFullPath ("") which is used to determine the current absolute path cmDependsC.cxx for each dependency file with absolute path. This call is extremely costly on the mac. And it seems completely unn

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 17:22, you wrote: > > Here I attach an extract of the strace output for the two calls mentioned > > above, however, this time on a linux system because I don't know how to > > get a trace on mac os x. > > More info on that here: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Platform_Depe

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

Here I attach an extract of the strace output for the two calls mentioned above, however, this time on a linux system because I don't know how to get a trace on mac os x. More info on that here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Platform_Dependent_Issues You have to use ktrace/kdump HTH Math

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:47, you wrote: > Hi, > > > Von: Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ... > > > real0m15.032s > > user0m10.154s > > sys 0m4.593s > > > > with 2.4.1 compiled with type release ( which did not improve compared > > to > > > none) > > time /Users/roebel/src/cmake-2.4

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

Hi, > Von: Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > real0m15.032s > user0m10.154s > sys 0m4.593s > > with 2.4.1 compiled with type release ( which did not improve compared to > none) > time /Users/roebel/src/cmake-2.4.1/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends "Unix > Makefiles" /Users

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 03:43, William A. Hoffman wrote: > At 08:09 PM 5/1/2006, Axel Roebel wrote: > >Hello William, > > > >god news that there is a new version. I tried it instantly. > >My first impression was not so positive > >I found that it takes ages for the dependency checking. > >I am worki

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

At 08:09 PM 5/1/2006, Axel Roebel wrote: >Hello William, > >god news that there is a new version. I tried it instantly. >My first impression was not so positive >I found that it takes ages for the dependency checking. >I am working with template libraries where most of the code >is in include file

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

Hello William, god news that there is a new version. I tried it instantly. My first impression was not so positive I found that it takes ages for the dependency checking. I am working with template libraries where most of the code is in include files. May be it is due to that, but with cmake 2.2

Re: [CMake] Xcode generator problems

At 03:12 PM 5/1/2006, Axel Roebel wrote: >Hi, > >I just tried to generate Xcode project files for some of my >cmake supported sources. I encountered three problems: > >1) I tried to communicate -framework Carbon flags >to the link stage. I tried > >SET(LINK_FRAMEWORKS "-framework Accelerate -fram

[CMake] Xcode generator problems

Hi, I just tried to generate Xcode project files for some of my cmake supported sources. I encountered three problems: 1) I tried to communicate -framework Carbon flags to the link stage. I tried SET(LINK_FRAMEWORKS "-framework Accelerate -framework Carbon") SET(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS_R