Re: [CMake] variable inheritance

2012-05-03 Thread Patrick Spendrin
Am 03.05.2012 16:21, schrieb David Cole: > I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The > question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are > accidentally depending on this behavior > > Grr. > > > David C. > I submitted a bug report for this: http://public

Re: [CMake] variable inheritance

2012-05-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 03 May 2012, David Cole wrote: > I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The > question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are > accidentally depending on this behavior The p-word again ? Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [CMake] variable inheritance

2012-05-03 Thread David Cole
I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are accidentally depending on this behavior Grr. David C. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Patrick Spendrin wrote: > Hi, > > I just found something new for me, and w

[CMake] variable inheritance

2012-05-03 Thread Patrick Spendrin
Hi, I just found something new for me, and wondered if this qualifies as a bug: argv-bug.cmake function(testfunc1) message(STATUS "testfunc1: ${ARGV0} ${ARGV1} ${ARGV2}") testfunc2("${ARGV0}") endfunction(testfunc1) function(testfunc2) message(STATUS "testfunc2: ${ARGV0} ${ARGV1} ${A