Am 03.05.2012 16:21, schrieb David Cole:
> I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The
> question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are
> accidentally depending on this behavior
>
> Grr.
>
>
> David C.
>
I submitted a bug report for this:
http://public
On Thursday 03 May 2012, David Cole wrote:
> I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The
> question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are
> accidentally depending on this behavior
The p-word again ?
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
I think it qualifies as a bug because it's somewhat unexpected. The
question is: can we fix it without disrupting people who are
accidentally depending on this behavior
Grr.
David C.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Patrick Spendrin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found something new for me, and w
Hi,
I just found something new for me, and wondered if this qualifies as a bug:
argv-bug.cmake
function(testfunc1)
message(STATUS "testfunc1: ${ARGV0} ${ARGV1} ${ARGV2}")
testfunc2("${ARGV0}")
endfunction(testfunc1)
function(testfunc2)
message(STATUS "testfunc2: ${ARGV0} ${ARGV1} ${A