updated http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13761
adds ability to use "set_property(GLOBAL PROPERTY QUIET_INSTALL ON )"
Although this is a global option instead of just on a specific install
target, which I can see may also be useful.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
On 06/13/2014 11:49 AM, Stefan Eilemann wrote:
A global flag was not implemented, but would be a nice touch. I am not familiar
enough with CMake to know how this would look like (option?) nor how to start
implementing it. Any takers?
I'm also disappointed by the lack of feedback wrt 3.0 merge.
Stefan Eilemann wrote:
>
> On 13. Jun 2014, at 5:09, J Decker
> wrote:
>
>> Did this make it to 3.0 release? Could it have been implemented as more
>> of a global flag so I don't have to modify every single install() I have?
>
> A global flag was not implemented, but would be a nice touch. I
On 13. Jun 2014, at 5:09, J Decker wrote:
> Did this make it to 3.0 release? Could it have been implemented as more of
> a global flag so I don't have to modify every single install() I have?
A global flag was not implemented, but would be a nice touch. I am not familiar
enough with CMake t
I do not think so: there have been no activity on the ticket, no
answer on the mailing list since RC3 :-(
Maybe there is a better way than the ML or the bug tracker to get a
status update from CMake's team?
Cheers,
Manu
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:09 AM, J Decker wrote:
> Did this make it to 3.0
Did this make it to 3.0 release? Could it have been implemented as more
of a global flag so I don't have to modify every single install() I have?
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
> > Too bad it did not make it to RC3...
> > This is a really nice feature.
>
> Neither RC4 n
> Too bad it did not make it to RC3...
> This is a really nice feature.
Neither RC4 nor RC5.
Any chance to get it pulled?
Cheers,
Manu
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services t
Succesfully tested, thanks a lot!
Too bad it did not make it to RC3...
This is a really nice feature.
Cheers,
Manu
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:07 PM, David Cole wrote:
>> On 6. Apr 2014, at 16:48, David Cole wrote:
>>
>> > The patch says it's based on
>
> "9dadcae57bc8545d1af66ede4c91c06eaa49f9d6
On 6. Apr 2014, at 16:48, David Cole wrote:
> The patch says it's based on
"9dadcae57bc8545d1af66ede4c91c06eaa49f9d6" but I
> don't see that commit in CMake 'master' or 'next' branches..
> Where is that commit?
It's my local commit containing the changes. I don't think I have
push righ
Hi all,
On 5. Apr 2014, at 22:10, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
> Which cmake base version should be used to apply the patch?
> (I tried against 2.8.12.2 and 3.0.0-rc1-1 but I got failure in both cases)
It was against the git master (3.0). I'll rebased against current master and
resubmitted the patch (
The patch says it's based on "9dadcae57bc8545d1af66ede4c91c06eaa49f9d6"
but I don't see that commit in CMake 'master' or 'next' branches..
Where is that commit?
Thx,
David C.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wi
Hi Stefan,
Which cmake base version should be used to apply the patch?
(I tried against 2.8.12.2 and 3.0.0-rc1-1 but I got failure in both cases)
Thanks,
Manu
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Eilemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I gave the implementation of install(QUIET) a shot since it became an
Hi,
I gave the implementation of install(QUIET) a shot since it became an annoyance
in a project. Please see http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13761 for a patch
- feedback and merge into master are welcome!
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
http://www.eyescale.ch
https://github.com/Eyescale/
http://www.
13 matches
Mail list logo
