On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Andreas Pokorny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > So set WIN32 to true and see what happens. If it has bad side effects you
> > could also do
> > set(SYMBIAN TRUE)
> > in the platform file and add that one test in cmTarget.
>
> I am sure it will have bad side effects for us sooner or
Hello,
> So set WIN32 to true and see what happens. If it has bad side effects you
> could also do
> set(SYMBIAN TRUE)
> in the platform file and add that one test in cmTarget.
I am sure it will have bad side effects for us sooner or later. Do we
have to provide
a patch for cmTarget?
Why is this
On Monday 21 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I've adapted your Symbian.cmake - I've appended the most recent Cmake
> output to this post. The current corresponding toolchain/symbian.cmake
> files can be found here:
> https://garage.ran-dom.org/public/mixer-frans/brandneu/cmake-to
akeTestCCompiler.cmake
[1] C:/project/CMakeLists.txt
-- Configuring done
<<<<<<<<<<
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Neundorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 9:45 PM
To: cmake@cmake.org
Cc: Fürst, Frans
Subject: Re: [CMake]
Hi Frans,
On Thursday 17 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use CMake to build Symbian 9.2-FP1 (S60) executables in a
> generic way (i.e. not building mmp-files which have to be interpreted by
> perl-scripts provided with the SDKs). There have been similar questions
> aske
Hi,
I'm trying to use CMake to build Symbian 9.2-FP1 (S60) executables in a generic
way (i.e. not building mmp-files which have to be interpreted by perl-scripts
provided with the SDKs).
There have been similar questions asked here before but I haven't found a
complete answer yet that would ma
