Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-05-02 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi again, however, I've now uploaded a patch for 2.6.4 now. http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=8102 kind regards Clemens Clemens Arth schrieb: Hi, as 2.6.4 was released yesterday I wanted to ask you what you think is the best way to port the current patches forward from 2.6.3. Do you

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-05-02 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi, as 2.6.4 was released yesterday I wanted to ask you what you think is the best way to port the current patches forward from 2.6.3. Do you want to further support my stuff which you have already integrated into your patch yourself, or do you think it would be better to port the stuff forwa

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-17 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi there, 2009/4/16 Andreas Pokorny : > [...] > Ok the patch was now modified that only a single platform > configuration is generated, and the Platform is selected through the > generator. But you still have to manually select the compiler, either > through a toolchain file or through the cmake-g

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-16 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, 2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : > Using the generator facility really sounds like a good idea. The remaining > question is just if you also can get the information out of the vcpackages > xml file which toolchain file to use (setting the PlatformName string > basically). Looking at my xml file there

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-16 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, 2009/4/16 Alexey Sariy : > [...] > First available platform is selected by default. You can configure another > in CMakeLists.txt or through GUI. For this we have implemented VALID_VALUES > property for variables. (As I understand it was merged as STRINGS property > in cmake repo). Variable

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-16 Thread Clemens Arth
Alexey Sariy schrieb: Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hi, 2009/4/16 Alexey Sariy : Hello all. Please see another implementation of WinCE projects generator here http://www.vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 . Hi Alexey, thanks for pointing us to your solution to the problem that - at least me - mi

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-16 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, 2009/4/16 Alexey Sariy : > Hello all. > > Please see another implementation of WinCE projects generator here > http://www.vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 . I just had a short look at the code. Is it true that you always pick the fist platform from the list of platforms found in the WCE.VCPlatfor

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-16 Thread Andreas Pokorny
2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : > [...] > > Using the generator facility really sounds like a good idea. The remaining > question is just if you also can get the information out of the vcpackages > xml file which toolchain file to use (setting the PlatformName string > basically). Looking at my xml file t

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Clemens Arth
Andreas Pokorny schrieb: 2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : That's a great idea actually, but I already mentioned exactly this about 9 months ago when we started the discussion. It would definitely be the best solution, but at that time I could not figure out how to do it in a clever way because there

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Pokorny
2009/4/15 Andreas Pokorny : > Hi Clemens, > > Finally.. Here is an updated patch that integrates both WinCE patches: > http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 > > > With a small bug ... $(INSTRUCTIONSET) and $(ARCHFAM) and $(_ARCHFAM_) > is not appended to the C flags, but only C++ flags. And anothe

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi Clemens, Finally.. Here is an updated patch that integrates both WinCE patches: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 With a small bug ... $(INSTRUCTIONSET) and $(ARCHFAM) and $(_ARCHFAM_) is not appended to the C flags, but only C++ flags. kind regards Andreas Pokorny __

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Pokorny
2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : > > That's a great idea actually, but I already mentioned exactly this about 9 > months ago when we started the discussion. It would definitely be the best > solution, but at that time I could not figure out how to do it in a clever > way because there is (to my knowledge)

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Clemens Arth
Andreas Pokorny schrieb: Hi, 2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : [...] In my case for example, I build it for Win32 and Windows Mobile 5 in separate directories which works great. If you install an SH4 SDK and an ARM SDK, preconfigure the cache files and configure/build in separate directories with dif

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, 2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : > [...] > In my case for example, I build it for Win32 and Windows Mobile 5 in > separate directories which works great. If you install an SH4 SDK and an ARM > SDK, preconfigure the cache files and configure/build in separate > directories with different settings it sh

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, 2009/4/15 Clemens Arth : > Hi again, > > I've installed the 2008 Express version, and it's not possible to install > any Mobile SDK afterwards. Microsoft supports Smat Devices in every version > except for the Express one. Even if you hack the msi file to install (not > checking if the righ

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi again, I've installed the 2008 Express version, and it's not possible to install any Mobile SDK afterwards. Microsoft supports Smat Devices in every version except for the Express one. Even if you hack the msi file to install (not checking if the right VS version is installed), it is still

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-15 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi, well, I have not tested it with the Express versions of 2005 or 2008 (I think Microsoft already stopped support of Express 2005, so there is only Express 2008 left). I will try to get it to run with an Express Version of 2008, although I have no idea of support for Windows Mobile devices

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-14 Thread Andreas Pokorny
2009/4/14 Andreas Pokorny : > [...] > > Configuring our project fails during the CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake > tests, because it tries to execute the generated project files with > VCExpress wich has no SDK configured - and I doubt that it supports > multiple SDKs at all. I am investigating that right

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-04-14 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, I just got a task to create a patched version of cmake with CE SDK support for Visual Studio (for internal evaluation), and to do whatever is necessary to get the patch into shape for inclusion to cmake. @Clemens: I just took http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8102 and http://cmake.org/Bug/view

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-30 Thread Clemens Arth
Bill Hoffman schrieb: Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hello, 2009/3/23 Bill Hoffman : [..] Basically, something that runs the new code. Compile a WinCE project, and somehow verify that it compiled it correctly. So we need a couple of source files that pull in at least some basic API headers.. and a

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hello, 2009/3/23 Bill Hoffman : [..] Basically, something that runs the new code. Compile a WinCE project, and somehow verify that it compiled it correctly. So we need a couple of source files that pull in at least some basic API headers.. and a script file to run cmak

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, 2009/3/23 Bill Hoffman : [..] > > Basically, something that runs the new code.  Compile a WinCE project, and > somehow verify that it compiled it correctly. So we need a couple of source files that pull in at least some basic API headers.. and a script file to run cmake and trigger the bui

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
Clemens Arth wrote: Bill Hoffman wrote: Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hi, Any news from the WinCE Support front? There are four patch tickets in mantis: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8102 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Clemens Arth
Bill Hoffman wrote: Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hi, Any news from the WinCE Support front? There are four patch tickets in mantis: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8102 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7434 Are there any

Re: [CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Bill Hoffman
Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hi, Any news from the WinCE Support front? There are four patch tickets in mantis: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8102 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7434 Are there any tests included in th

[CMake] WinCE Support

2009-03-23 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, Any news from the WinCE Support front? There are four patch tickets in mantis: http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7919 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8486 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8102 http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7434 kind regards Andreas Pokorny