The matrix is very useful.
Thanks for working on this :)
Jc
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 23.05.2013, 19:38:26 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
> > the matrix is getting a bit out of date, the last update is for 2.8.8.
> > Can you try to create an updated versio
Hi,
Am 23.05.2013, 19:38:26 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
> the matrix is getting a bit out of date, the last update is for 2.8.8.
> Can you try to create an updated version ?
No problem, I'll do it somewhere in the next few weeks.
Johannes
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware ope
Hi,
On Saturday 28 April 2012, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I tried to upload the new matrix today, but the page on standard modules is
> too big (112kb): On my current internet connection I get a timeout before
> the upload finishes.
>
> Maybe you can do the upload? The text is availabl
Hi David,
I tried to upload the new matrix today, but the page on standard modules is
too big (112kb): On my current internet connection I get a timeout before the
upload finishes.
Maybe you can do the upload? The text is available from
https://github.com/jzarl/cmake-
vcm/blob/master/split_pag
Hi David,
Yes, I should have time somewhere this week...
Johannes
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 11:20:48 PM David Cole wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Time to update again, this time for CMake 2.8.8.
>
> Do you have time to do the update again in the next week or two?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Th
Hi Johannes,
Time to update again, this time for CMake 2.8.8.
Do you have time to do the update again in the next week or two?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> This is great news! I have updated the matrix to use footnotes, and also added
> th
Hi David,
This is great news! I have updated the matrix to use footnotes, and also added
the 2.8.7 changes to it. The whole matrix now looks much more clearly:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Version_Compatibility_Matrix
Cheers,
Johannes
On Tuesday 03 January 2012 17:25:31 David Cole wrote:
The Cite extension is now installed on the CMake wiki. See this page
to see what mediawiki extensions are available:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Special:Version
HTH,
David
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I guess I'll have time this week to update the matri
Hi David,
I guess I'll have time this week to update the matrix.
In case the admin team would like to have a rationale for installing the Cite
extension: Having the Cite extension would allow me to write the matrix in a
more compact/less cluttered style.
Thanks for lobbying for this issue!
Hi Johannes,
Time to update again, this time for CMake 2.8.7.
This page tells me what the Cite extension is:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite
This page tells me it's not installed yet on the CMake wiki server:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Special:Version
I'll ask the admin team to inst
Hello David,
I just finished the updated version for 2.8.6. Can you maybe check again with
the wiki admins if the Cite extension can be added to the CMake wiki?
Cheers,
Johannes
Ceterum censeo emendationem "Cite" esse immuniendam.
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 16:51:43 David Cole wrote:
> S
On Wednesday 05 October 2011, David Cole wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:51 AM, David Cole wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Saturday 04 December 2010, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The compatibility matrix fo
Hi,
I'll probably get to it in the next 1-3 weeks...
Cheers,
Johannes
>>>On 10/05/2011 at 16:51, David Cole wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Saturday 04 December 2010, Johannes Zarl wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The compatibility matrix for
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:51 AM, David Cole wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Saturday 04 December 2010, Johannes Zarl wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The compatibility matrix for different versions of cmake is now complete
>>> and awaits review:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 04 December 2010, Johannes Zarl wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The compatibility matrix for different versions of cmake is now complete
>> and awaits review:
>> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Version_Compatibility_Matrix
>>
Hi,
So I've started bringing the matrix up to date. Just to make sure I'm not
reporting documentation-changes as real changes, please take a look at the
following items and correct me where I'm wrong:
Changes from 2.8.3 to 2.8.4:
* get_cmake_property:
previously re
Apparently I forgot to add the list in my reply to Alexander, so
here for all to read:
Now that I'm back from my vacation, I'll get to it soonish (during
August).
Cheers,
Johannes
On 07/14/2011 at 14:03, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> now cmake 2.8.5 has been released, could you please if you find the time
> update that page ?
> It's really useful :-)
Second that motion - it just helped me figure out another issue! :-)
Cheers,
CY
___
Hi,
On Saturday 04 December 2010, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The compatibility matrix for different versions of cmake is now complete
> and awaits review:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Version_Compatibility_Matrix
>
> Apart from factual errors and things I might have missed, I am also
On 12/06/2010 at 12:33, David Cole wrote:
> Wow!
>
> I wondered why all the responses here started with "wow" and then I
> clicked through to see for myself this morning.
Thank you all for your positive feedback, it is appreciated.
> This is a *great* page. Phenomenally complete summary. Is i
Wow!
I wondered why all the responses here started with "wow" and then I
clicked through to see for myself this morning.
This is a *great* page. Phenomenally complete summary. Is it going to
be easy to add a column for CMake 2.8.4 after its release? Or is it
going to be painful?
Can you describe
Wow. Thank you for making this. I think it will be a huge resource
for CMake users. Nothing is more annoying than having to track down
when something was added, or not realizing that the behavior that you
rely upon did not exist in a previous version.
On Saturday, December 4, 2010, Johannes Zar
Wow that is impressive. Not only does it lay out the version
information well, it also represents a very nice overview of available
knobs to tweak - I've already spotted one or two I need to roll back
into my own CMake scripts, and I'm sure there are more.Thank you
for all the time and effort
On 2010-12-04 16:58+0100 Johannes Zarl wrote:
Hello,
The compatibility matrix for different versions of cmake is now complete and
awaits review: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Version_Compatibility_Matrix
Apart from factual errors and things I might have missed, I am also interested
if someon
Hello,
The compatibility matrix for different versions of cmake is now complete and
awaits review: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Version_Compatibility_Matrix
Apart from factual errors and things I might have missed, I am also interested
if someone has a better idea for embedding the comments:
25 matches
Mail list logo
