Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres 09 Gener 2009, Hendrik Sattler va escriure: > Philip Lowman schrieb: > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Philip Lowman wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >>> if (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) > >>> set (LibOpenJPEG_LIBRARIES ${openjpeg_LIBRARY}) >

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Philip Lowman schrieb: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Philip Lowman wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >>> if (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) >>> set (LibOpenJPEG_LIBRARIES ${openjpeg_LIBRARY}) >>> endif (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) >> >> If you spot any

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-09 Thread Philip Lowman
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Philip Lowman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> if (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) >> set (LibOpenJPEG_LIBRARIES ${openjpeg_LIBRARY}) >> endif (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) > > > If you spot any find modules with this syntax t

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-09 Thread Philip Lowman
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Ok, so at the end it is > > find_path(LibOpenJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR openjpeg.h > PATH_SUFFIXES openjpeg openjpeg-1.0) > > find_library(LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY openjpeg) > > if (LibOpenJPEG_OPENJPEG_LIBRARY) > set (LibOpenJPEG_LIBRA

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Alexander Neundorf wrote: And are you sure you want to name it "FindLIBOPENJPEG.cmake" and not maybe "FindLibOpenJPEG.cmake" ? That's the capitalization they use on their webpage. For that matter, should it even have "Lib", or be just "FindOpenJPEG"? Just my $0.02, feel free to ignore me :-).

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: ... > > And are you sure you want to name it "FindLIBOPENJPEG.cmake" and not > > maybe "FindLibOpenJPEG.cmake" ? That's the capitalization they use on > > their webpage. > > Ok, so at the

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > Hi Albert, > > On Thursday 08 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi Albert, On Thursday 08 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > > On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct > > > procedure, i read a bit in the wiki and

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, vàreu escriure: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct > > procedure, i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > > > I want to add upstream the two attached modules

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct > > procedure, i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > > > I want to add upstream the two attac

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, > i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > I want to add upstream the two attached modules so we don't have to > maintain them in poppler. I'll h

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dijous 08 Gener 2009, Hendrik Sattler va escriure: > Am Wednesday 07 January 2009 23:54:05 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct > > procedure, i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > > > I want to add upstream the tw

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, i > read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > I want to add upstream the two attached modules so we don't have to maintain > them in poppler. I'

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-08 Thread Philip Lowman
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Wednesday 07 January 2009 23:54:05 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct > procedure, > > i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > > > I want to add upstream t

Re: [CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-07 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Wednesday 07 January 2009 23:54:05 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, > i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. > > I want to add upstream the two attached modules so we don't have to > maintain them in poppl

[CMake] Volunteering to maintain two new Find Modules

2009-01-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi, i'm new to the list, so i'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, i read a bit in the wiki and it seems it is, so here i am. I want to add upstream the two attached modules so we don't have to maintain them in poppler. I'll have to maintain them upstream but maybe more people will use