Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-10 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, Thank you for the review. I will not be able to apply the changes this month. Right now other things are important for our project. Maybe someone else has time to improve the files. I expect that our project schedule will force us to support wince at the end of august. Some time before that

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 07 July 2008, you wrote: > Hi, > > I'll submit a patch as soon as I've managed to work around some remaining > issues. After messing around with some registry stuff, here's where I'm > currently standing. I had a hard time to find whether VS stores the > information on all the different

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-07 Thread Clemens Arth
43 +0200 > Von: Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: cmake@cmake.org > Betreff: Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs > On Friday 04 July 2008, Clemens Arth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here's a short progress report. I've now managed to get

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 30 June 2008, Andreas Pokorny wrote: > Hi, > > Why is there a Windows-cl.cmake and no Window-msvc.cmake? In cmake < 2.6 this filename was composed from CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME and the basename of the compiler (cl.exe, also with Visual Studio). In cmake 2.6 this was extended and now compilers

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 04 July 2008, Clemens Arth wrote: > Hi, > > here's a short progress report. I've now managed to get my project compiled > with Visual Studio 2008 with and without support for Windows Mobile 5 SDK; Cool :-) > I basically managed that by compiling cmake from scratch, introducing a new > p

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 04 July 2008, Clemens Arth wrote: ... > ad 2/3) In my case the SDK name would be "Windows Mobile 5.0 Pocket PC SDK > (ARMV4I)"; alternatively, it might be "Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone SDK > (ARMV4I)" or "Windows Mobile 6 Professional SDK" something for WM6, but > anyway, I can only use

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-04 Thread Clemens Arth
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:31:13 +0200 > Von: "Andreas Pokorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "Clemens Arth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: cmake@cmake.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-04 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi there, 2008/7/4 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > here's a short progress report. I've now managed to get my project compiled > with > Visual Studio 2008 with and without support for Windows Mobile 5 SDK; I > basically > managed that by compiling cmake from scratch, introducing a ne

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-04 Thread Clemens Arth
lemens Original-Nachricht > Datum: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:03:05 -0400 > Von: Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Andreas Pokorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: cmake@cmake.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: [CMake

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-01 Thread Bill Hoffman
Andreas Pokorny wrote: Hello, I have only tried with NMake yet. I would only expect NMake or gmake to work. -Bill ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-01 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, I have only tried with NMake yet. kind regards Andreas Pokorny ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-01 Thread Clemens Arth
uot;Andreas Pokorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "Clemens Arth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: cmake@cmake.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs > Hi Clemens, > > 2008/7/1 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-01 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi Clemens, 2008/7/1 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi again, > >> I took a look at your files and I think you have done a pretty good job >> and that should work out well. For some reason I had to force the compiler >> setting to be MSVC, because cmake did not set it automatically. > > I als

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-07-01 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi again, > I took a look at your files and I think you have done a pretty good job > and that should work out well. For some reason I had to force the compiler > setting to be MSVC, because cmake did not set it automatically. I also had to force the CXX compiler setting to MSVC. > However, the

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-30 Thread Clemens Arth
chricht > Datum: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:49:19 +0200 > Von: "Andreas Pokorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: cmake@cmake.org > Betreff: Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs > Hi, > > Why is there a Windows-cl

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-30 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hello, Right now the WindowsCE Version is harcoded to 5.0 in the macros and the subsystem definition. A better solution might be to use the CMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION. For that I would need a decimal-string to integer or hex conversion and reasonable defaults when CMAKE_SYSTEM_VERSION is not set. Is ther

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-30 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi, Why is there a Windows-cl.cmake and no Window-msvc.cmake? Shall I include things like Platform/cl inside a WinCE-msvc file? Will I need both WinCE-MSVC-C-YourHardware.cmake and WinCE-MSVC-CXX-YourHardware.cmake? I have attached the current status, it would be nice if you could review the ch

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-30 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi, > What is the difference between all these different windows CE systems? > I.e. is windows > mobile 5 the same as windows ce 5? well, I'm not sure if they are the same. Windows mobile 5 and 6 sdks are available in different packages (standard and professional), but each of them allows for "

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Andreas Pokorny wrote: > Hi there, > We have just started getting WinCE platform files to work. I have worked > around the /system:console issues mentioned in the mails below. I basically > reused the existing Windows and Windows-cl platform files, and made changes > where

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-28 Thread Andreas Pokorny
Hi there, We have just started getting WinCE platform files to work. I have worked around the /system:console issues mentioned in the mails below. I basically reused the existing Windows and Windows-cl platform files, and made changes where the scripts try to execute compiled applications. Building

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-26 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Clemens Arth wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to setup cmake for creating visual studio 2005/2008 > solution files linking against windows mobile 5/6. I've read a few > postings from September-November 2007 about that issues, but I finally > did not find a closed-form

[CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs

2008-06-26 Thread Clemens Arth
Hi, I'm currently trying to setup cmake for creating visual studio 2005/2008 solution files linking against windows mobile 5/6. I've read a few postings from September-November 2007 about that issues, but I finally did not find a closed-form solution to this. Has anyone worked around all the