Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread James Bigler
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 10/25/2013 4:36 PM, James Bigler wrote: > >> My experience mirrored Clint's. Our version of CMake on the farm was at >> 2.8.12, but locally developers were at differing versions. What made >> matters worse is that it is a lot harder to di

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/25/2013 4:36 PM, James Bigler wrote: My experience mirrored Clint's. Our version of CMake on the farm was at 2.8.12, but locally developers were at differing versions. What made matters worse is that it is a lot harder to diagnose problems from farm built binaries, so it wasn't until one

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread James Bigler
My experience mirrored Clint's. Our version of CMake on the farm was at 2.8.12, but locally developers were at differing versions. What made matters worse is that it is a lot harder to diagnose problems from farm built binaries, so it wasn't until one of the 4 developers looking into this problem

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread Clinton Stimpson
On Friday, October 25, 2013 02:52:45 PM David Cole wrote: > > Hmmm... Well that was a not backward compatible way of doing it. > > This behavior has existed for a long long time. > > Sorry for the extra effort you had to expend tracking down a mysterious > problem because of this change. I remem

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread David Cole
Hmmm... Well that was a not backward compatible way of doing it.  This behavior has existed for a long long time. Sorry for the extra effort you had to expend tracking down a mysterious problem because of this change. I remember having some discussions (probably just verbal, though, I can't fi

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread James Bigler
Hmmm... Well that was a not backward compatible way of doing it. This behavior has existed for a long long time. Thanks for your help, James On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote: > On 25.10.2013 18:42, James Bigler wrote: > >> When did CMake stop adding /STACK:1000 to the l

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread Nils Gladitz
On 25.10.2013 18:42, James Bigler wrote: When did CMake stop adding /STACK:1000 to the link line? 2.8.11: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12437 Nils -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

[CMake] Visual Studio and /STACK

2013-10-25 Thread James Bigler
When did CMake stop adding /STACK:1000 to the link line? I just spent several days trying to figure out why my code started failing in strange ways, and I traced it down to this. Thanks, James -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://ww