Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
If none of the developers sees any important issue with this proposal,
I'll submit a feature request based on what has been discussed in the
current thread.
Thanks all,
I am not sure I like the idea. It is too make specific. The makefiles
that cmake generates shou
If none of the developers sees any important issue with this proposal, I'll
submit a feature request based on what has been discussed in the current
thread.
Thanks all,
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Kito Berg-Taylor > wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Kito Berg-Taylor
wrote:
> I would like to second this idea, because it would solve another problem
> I'm having regarding CMake and environment variables.
>
Oh, now that you mention environment variables, I think I could also
benefit from that too!
> Not to men
I would like to second this idea, because it would solve another problem
I'm having regarding CMake and environment variables.
Not to mention that being able to set the default to -j4 would be useful
for internal projects where it's known that all machines building the
project will have uniform h
On 5. Mar, 2009, at 10:53, Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
I would definitely support the idea. It's more or less what I was
looking
for. I have a question on the proposal: Would the -Go flags have to
be set
once per build folder (as the -G flag is), or could it be reset in
succesive
runs of cmake
I would definitely support the idea. It's more or less what I was looking
for. I have a question on the proposal: Would the -Go flags have to be set
once per build folder (as the -G flag is), or could it be reset in succesive
runs of cmake? Both alternatives would work for me, but I think I prefer
2009/3/5 Adolfo Rodríguez :
> Thanks Philip,
>
> I had considered the alias option before, but wanted to rule out that there
> was no way of doing it the scope of a cmake project, however strange that
> may sound. I will probably take that path now.
Note that I find the idea of being able to pass
Thanks Philip,
I had considered the alias option before, but wanted to rule out that there
was no way of doing it the scope of a cmake project, however strange that
may sound. I will probably take that path now.
Cheers,
Adolfo
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Philip Lowman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to specify with cmake default options to
> the make command, i.e., when I type "make foo", it would be equivalent to
> "make -j foo", or "make -C some/path foo". My first impression is that
> messi
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to specify with cmake default options to
the make command, i.e., when I type "make foo", it would be equivalent to
"make -j foo", or "make -C some/path foo". My first impression is that
messing around with what "make" does is out of the scope of cmake (and mayb
10 matches
Mail list logo
