2010/8/17 Rolf Eike Beer :
> Am Tuesday 17 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
>
>> set(CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_RELOCATABLE TRUE)
>>
>> and CPackRPM will try to build a relocatable package.
>> This will surely FAIL if:
>> - some file are installed with absolute path
>
> Do you mean the packaging will
Am Tuesday 17 August 2010 schrieb Eric Noulard:
> set(CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_RELOCATABLE TRUE)
>
> and CPackRPM will try to build a relocatable package.
> This will surely FAIL if:
> - some file are installed with absolute path
Do you mean the packaging will fail or the installation? When you ha
2010/8/17 Gerald Hofmann :
> Hi Will,
>
> I found a way to make the RPM relocatable.
>
> This brings some light into rpm relocation:
> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-reloc.html
>
> The Prefix: tag gives the part of the file names which is replaced when
> another prefix is specified. You can di
Hi Will,
I found a way to make the RPM relocatable.
This brings some light into rpm relocation:
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-reloc.html
The Prefix: tag gives the part of the file names which is replaced when another
prefix is specified. You can divert CPACK_RPM_SPEC_MORE_DEFINE from its
2010/2/11 Will Dicharry :
> Is there a way to make an RPM package generated with CPack relocatable?
Should be possible, theoretically.
Currently the spec file generated by CPackRPM is not.
As far as I remember relocatable RPM should avoid absolute file
install and use %prefix directive.
(correct
Is there a way to make an RPM package generated with CPack relocatable?
Thanks in advance,
-- Will
--
Will Dicharry
Software Developer
Stellar Science Ltd Co
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit
