Jesper Eskilson wrote:
> Those of you who haven't already read "Version Control and 'the 80%'"
> should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before* forming
> your opinion on centralized version control.
That article mixes some reasonable points with a good dose of nonsense,
so please
Jesper Eskilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mike Jackson wrote:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
> >
> > Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
> > you can get past Linus' personality.
>
Check out this presentation by Randal Schwartz on git. He d
On Jan 5, 2008 5:58 PM, Sebastien BARRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1/5/2008 09:24 PM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
>
> >Those of you who haven't already read "Version Control and 'the
> >80%'" should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before*
> >forming your opinion on centralized versi
At 1/5/2008 09:24 PM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Those of you who haven't already read "Version Control and 'the
80%'" should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before*
forming your opinion on centralized version control.
Interesting read, especially the paragraph about: "In a nutshe
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Here are my two cents:
I actually held Linus opinion in rather high regard until he went
berzerk on how bad Subversion is. *
Joshua Jensen wrote:
> * Con: Requires an SSH daemon to push data. I just barely got this
> going (through copSSH) with the replacement git-shell, because I don't
> want people to have shell access to my machine. Locking down user
> permissions and directories on a Windows box stinks. I've got t
James Mansion wrote:
Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
Yes, but not as well as on Linux. There's two ports of it.
The cygwin port wh
On 2008-01-04 22:38- James Mansion wrote:
Gonzalo Garramu�o wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
As already mentioned earlier in this thread, git is av
- Original Message -
From: James Mansion
Date: 1/4/2008 3:38 PM
> Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
>> In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize
that you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
>>
> Does git work on Win32?
Pretty well, I've found
Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
developers, but most software projects (such as CMake) will never have more
than a handful of active developers
cmake already has about 10-20 or so developers (if you consider all the
.cmake module contributions). People with commit access, however, are
much fewer right
Mike Jackson wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
>
> Git - straight from Linus.
I have this strange preference for my own voice and personality :-)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7724296011317502612
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Jan 4, 2008 3:50 PM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-01-04 07:17-0800 E. Wing wrote:
>
> > My 2 cents.
> >
> > Distributed [version control system] is the right way to go in my opinion.
>
> I don't completely agree. Centralized repositories have proved useful for
> lots of so
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Mike
On Jan 4, 2008 4:11 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > However, I admit to having no development expe
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> However, I admit to having no development experience with git or Mercurial.
> Is there anything compelling (e.g., fewer bugs, better documentation, more
> useful features aside from distributed?) about either over svn for
> projects like CMake that use a centralized repo?
A
On 2008-01-04 07:17-0800 E. Wing wrote:
My 2 cents.
Distributed [version control system] is the right way to go in my opinion.
I don't completely agree. Centralized repositories have proved useful for
lots of software development projects (e.g., the 160,000+ free software
projects at SourceF
On Jan 4, 2008 10:17 AM, E. Wing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think Linus pointed to some scalability problems in Monotone and I
> think others have pointed to performance and memory usage problems
> with Bazaar (OpenSolaris?, Mozilla?).
I don't know what they tried before, but Mozilla is a Me
On 12/22/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 6:48 PM, Andreas Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> > > That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS -> SVN
> > > migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse
And what about Bazaar (the tool used by Ubuntu/Caronical) ?
http://bazaar-vcs.org/
Regards,
Félix C. Morency
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:53:10 -0500
From: "Brandon Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [CMake] Re: Migration to subversion
To: cmake@cmak
On Dec 22, 2007 6:48 PM, Andreas Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> > That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS -> SVN
> > migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming
> > you weren't using svn and trying to sell it to
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS -> SVN
> migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming
> you weren't using svn and trying to sell it to you :)
Before you switch to svn please use git. It's much better than the pa
Use "cvs2cl" and read the ChangeLog file that the command creates. I only
know
it on Linux though. The result is pretty much the same as "svn log".
Thanks Hendrik, this will be a valuable tool.
svn doesn't really do tagging and branching, it only does copies.
Which accomplishes the same bus
That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS -> SVN migration,
I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming you weren't
using svn and trying to sell it to you :)
Regards,
rod
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
ht
23 matches
Mail list logo
