I noticed this post earlier. Bill, how would i use the "unsupported
feature" of cmake to use precompiled headers for visual studio 2005?
I am about to start write a new generator which extends the existing
code, but was wondering if there was some undocumented way to do this.
Otherwise i am go
> What I need is a way to add in a specific
attribute in the XML project > (namely UsingPrecompiledHeaders = X). This
will tell the ide what to do.
To write to the XML files additionnal info that it
is not supported by CMake, you must write your own generator. Or extend the
current generator
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
To: "Sylvain Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Cc: mailto:cmake@cmake.org>>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Question about Windows support.
> How did you (1) disable
> SET(CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION TRUE)>
will do the same thing but without having to modifiy the source of
cmake.
I tried it and it works great.
It is just needed to add the source file manually
if CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION is set.
IF(CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION)
LIST(APPEND TARGET
Great, thank you Bill !
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sylvain Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Cole"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Questio
At 08:31 AM 6/5/2006, Sylvain Benner wrote:
>I wrote a custom generator to do this. You must get the source files from the
>CVS.
>
>(1) You can disable the custom build rules by redefining :
>void cmLocalVisualStudio7GeneratorMP::AddVCProjBuildRule(cmTarget& tgt)
>
SET(CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATI
time (Configure button).
Cheers,
Sylvain
- Original Message -
From: "David Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sylvain Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <cmake@cmake.org>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Question about Wi
illiam A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Question about Windows support.
Thank you for the reply. This sounds very encouraging! I have
ordered a copy of the book from Kitware about CMake. In order to more
quickly come up
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Question about Windows support.
Thank you for the reply. This sounds very encouraging! I have
ordered a copy of the book from Kitware about CMake. In order to more
quickly come up to speed on how to do the things listed in my original
p
James Mansion wrote:
> MinGW / MSYS and Cygwin are
fine also. Windows != Visual Studio. :-)
In 20-something years working (mostly in
investment backs) on systems with
Win32 and UNIX deployment, I've *never* seen a
team deploy C or C++ on
Win32 with
gcc.
So what? Who ca
At 11:37 AM 6/3/2006, James Mansion wrote:
>>Please give specific examples of this, these are bugs. For the most part
>the properties
>>should match the flags used.
>
>Most recently I noticed with 'defines' and I think include
>paths. But definitely the project relationships don't seem
>set up.
>Please give specific examples of this, these are bugs. For the most part
the properties
>should match the flags used.
Most recently I noticed with 'defines' and I think include
paths. But definitely the project relationships don't seem
set up. I'll try to distill something.
___
At 04:35 AM 6/3/2006, James Mansion wrote:
> find that the generated projects
>Do The Right Thing but don't always reflect settings properly in the Properties
>viewers, which is a pain.
Please give specific examples of this, these are bugs. For the most part the
properties
should match the fla
> MinGW / MSYS and Cygwin are fine
also. Windows != Visual Studio. :-)
In
20-something years working (mostly in investment backs) on systems
with
Win32
and UNIX deployment, I've *never* seen a team deploy C or C++
on
Win32
with gcc.
VisualStudio is number 1 by an enormous margin. L
William A. Hoffman wrote:
Windows Visual Studio is one of the major platforms for CMake, and is
very actively supported.
MinGW / MSYS and Cygwin are fine also. Windows != Visual Studio. :-)
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
CMake mailing l
Thank you for the reply. This sounds very encouraging! I have
ordered a copy of the book from Kitware about CMake. In order to more
quickly come up to speed on how to do the things listed in my original
post can you suggest any resources? Thus far in my searching of the
mailing list archive I
At 12:38 PM 6/2/2006, Bennett Smith wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm just starting to learn cmake, and am wondering what the level of
>on-going support is for the Windows platform. A couple things that I
>am hoping cmake can do are:
>
>1. Handle generation of library and executable targets with different
>names
Hi,
I'm just starting to learn cmake, and am wondering what the level of
on-going support is for the Windows platform. A couple things that I
am hoping cmake can do are:
1. Handle generation of library and executable targets with different
names for debug and release configurations.
2. Handle
18 matches
Mail list logo
