Hi,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:56:22PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this has been raised in the past, but I don't think the
> > arguments for not providing the binaries are strong enough to
> > warrant the hassle a
On 1/8/2014 4:07 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
What 64-bit Linux distribution, that doesn't package CMake, do you
use?
Still it is not a bad idea to provide them since 32 bit is now mostly a
compatibility thing. It maybe that a distro does not provide the most
recent version or a user does not ha
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:56:22PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this has been raised in the past, but I don't think the
> arguments for not providing the binaries are strong enough to
> warrant the hassle a cmake user has to go through to run the 32bit
> binaries on a 64bit Linux
Hi,
I know this has been raised in the past, but I don't think the arguments
for not providing the binaries are strong enough to warrant the hassle a
cmake user has to go through to run the 32bit binaries on a 64bit Linux
distribution.
I think requiring users to figure out how to install 32bit co
