On Sunday, January 8, 2012, Fraser Hutchison <
fraser.hutchi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 14:41, David Cole wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:47 PM, David Doria wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Not too long ago I wa
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:47 PM, David Doria wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Not too long ago I was browsing the project of a friend who worked on BTK
>> (The toolkit used by Mokka, a motion kinematic & kinetic analyser) [1].
>>
>>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Not too long ago I was browsing the project of a friend who worked on BTK
> (The toolkit used by Mokka, a motion kinematic & kinetic analyser) [1].
>
> I noticed that he is using cxxtest [2] along with ctest. It s
Hi David,
Not too long ago I was browsing the project of a friend who worked on BTK
(The toolkit used by Mokka, a motion kinematic & kinetic analyser) [1].
I noticed that he is using *cxxtest* [2] along with *ctest*. It seems it
could to address the use case you are describing.
See Example integ
Does CTest have a mechanism to run man mini-tests in a single file?
I'm looking for something equivalent to the UnitTest++ syntax:
TEST(YourTestName)
{}
TEST(YourOtherTestName){}
int main(){ return UnitTest::RunAllTests();}
Of course you could do something like:
int YourTestName()
{
}
int Your
