Re: [CMake] Module CMakeParseArguments: confusing last paragraph in documentation

2015-02-24 Thread Marcel Loose
I guess that would imply that "not" is missing twice, [...] would not be empty [...] and [...] would not be set to TRUE [...]. Marcel. On 24/02/15 12:31, Petr Kmoch wrote: > My guess is there's a "not" missing between "would" and "result in > MY_INSTALL_DESTINATION set to" > > Petr >

Re: [CMake] Module CMakeParseArguments: confusing last paragraph in documentation

2015-02-24 Thread Petr Kmoch
My guess is there's a "not" missing between "would" and "result in MY_INSTALL_DESTINATION set to" Petr On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Marcel Loose wrote: > Hi all, > > Several times I've read the last paragraph of the documentation of module > CMakeParseArguments, but I can't get my head ar

[CMake] Module CMakeParseArguments: confusing last paragraph in documentation

2015-02-24 Thread Marcel Loose
Hi all, Several times I've read the last paragraph of the documentation of module CMakeParseArguments, but I can't get my head around it. Keywords terminate lists of values, e.g. if directly after a one_value_keyword another recognized keyword follows, this is interpreted as the begin