Re: [CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-03 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 03 Mai 2010 15:14:31 schrieb Bill Hoffman: > On 5/3/2010 2:58 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > > Hi > > > > I really enjoy this mailing list, it is a very friendly place. But > > one thing that really annoys me at times is that the boilerplate > > footer doesn't get removed automagically in rep

Re: [CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-03 Thread Michael Wild
On 3. May, 2010, at 15:14 , Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 5/3/2010 2:58 AM, Michael Wild wrote: >> Hi >> >> I really enjoy this mailing list, it is a very friendly place. But >> one thing that really annoys me at times is that the boilerplate >> footer doesn't get removed automagically in replies, le

Re: [CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-03 Thread Michael Wild
On 3. May, 2010, at 15:14 , Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 5/3/2010 2:58 AM, Michael Wild wrote: >> Hi >> >> I really enjoy this mailing list, it is a very friendly place. But >> one thing that really annoys me at times is that the boilerplate >> footer doesn't get removed automagically in replies, le

Re: [CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 5/3/2010 2:58 AM, Michael Wild wrote: Hi I really enjoy this mailing list, it is a very friendly place. But one thing that really annoys me at times is that the boilerplate footer doesn't get removed automagically in replies, leading to ridiculous stuff like this if people are too lazy to edi

Re: [CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-03 Thread Mike Jackson
Or at least format the footer to not take as many lines. - Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net Principal Software Engineer mike.jack...@bluequartz.net BlueQuartz Software Dayton, Ohio On May 3, 2010, at 2:58, Michael Wild wrote: > Hi > > I really enjoy

[CMake] Mailing list footer

2010-05-02 Thread Michael Wild
Hi I really enjoy this mailing list, it is a very friendly place. But one thing that really annoys me at times is that the boilerplate footer doesn't get removed automagically in replies, leading to ridiculous stuff like this if people are too lazy to edit it out in their replies: