On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Sebastien BARRE
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 3/4/2008 12:28 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - CMake script must be maintained indefinitely for a small percentage
> > > > of users no matter what the migration strategy
> >
> >BTW, this point is
At 3/4/2008 12:28 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
> >
> > - CMake script must be maintained indefinitely for a small percentage
> > of users no matter what the migration strategy
BTW, this point is intended to mean that CMake script must always be
supported, even under the most wildly optimistic
Hi Brandon,
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nutshell: is it strategically a good idea to implement Lua support for
> CMake?
>
> - CMake script must be maintained indefinitely for a small percentage
> of users no matter what the migration st
Hi Ken,
2.Closing statements need and empty () [at least they don't need to
duplicate the expressions any more].
Technically I believe this is possible. It has been asked for in the past.
Just a change to the yacc IIRC. I tend to not mind () personally.
It has to be more or less as easy as t
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nutshell: is it strategically a good idea to implement Lua support for
> > CMake?
> >
> > - CMake script must be maintained indefinitely for a small percentage
> > of users no matter what the migration strate
> 2.Closing statements need and empty () [at least they don't need to
> duplicate the expressions any more].
Technically I believe this is possible. It has been asked for in the past.
Just a change to the yacc IIRC. I tend to not mind () personally.
> 7.It has no functions (implemented in the scr
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brandon wrote:
>
> I am starting to wonder if the whole Lua thing is indeed a red
> herring, and what CMake really needs is the best possible website to
> document, tutorialize, and market CMake. In ot
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon wrote:
> >
> > I am starting to wonder if the whole Lua thing is indeed a red
> > herring, and what CMake really needs is the best possible website to
> > document, tutorialize, and market CMake. In other wo
