Hi Alex,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:20 +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What is the best way to work around a broken Find module?
> >
> > A technique I've used up till now is to wrap the broken module in a
> > module with the sam
On Thursday 28 October 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the best way to work around a broken Find module?
>
> A technique I've used up till now is to wrap the broken module in a
> module with the same name that I store in my own module directory. This
> way, my wrapper module will be
If you look at my repository, I have a system set up that I call
"UseBackportedModules" - basically it checks the CMake version and
extends the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to include only those directories
mentioning newer version than the current user's cmake version. It
works pretty well for me.
http://g
Hi all,
What is the best way to work around a broken Find module?
A technique I've used up till now is to wrap the broken module in a
module with the same name that I store in my own module directory. This
way, my wrapper module will be picked up first. Problem with this
approach is, of course,