On Fri, February 22, 2008 10:07, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> BlinkEye wrote:
>> On Thu, February 21, 2008 22:23, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> On 2008-02-21 21:57+0100 blinkeye wrote:
[...]At the moment I'm just creating plain .so libs, without any version
number
(so far I didn't happen to come acr
BlinkEye wrote:
On Thu, February 21, 2008 22:23, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-02-21 21:57+0100 blinkeye wrote:
[...]At the moment I'm just creating plain .so libs, without any
version number (so far I didn't happen to come across a shared library
tutorial with cmake), maybe this is the problem
On Thu, February 21, 2008 22:23, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-02-21 21:57+0100 blinkeye wrote:
>
>> [...]At the moment I'm just creating plain .so libs, without any
>> version number (so far I didn't happen to come across a shared library
>> tutorial with cmake), maybe this is the problem? Does c
On 2008-02-21 21:57+0100 blinkeye wrote:
[...]At the moment I'm just creating plain .so libs, without any
version number (so far I didn't happen to come across a shared library
tutorial with cmake), maybe this is the problem? Does cmake support such a
versioning and would that resolve the reli
Hi guys
I'm getting along very well (and quickly!) with porting two large
projects from Makefiles to CMake. Actually, 3 projects will follow later
on (and possibly more). Yeah, CMake is actually THAT great. I just
wanted to share my delight and acknowledgement of this tool, it makes
developin
