On 5/31/2010 4:19 AM, Sebastian Meier wrote:
Hi Bill,
Can NetBeans be driven from the command line? That is a requirement for
getting try_compile to work.
No, I don't think it is possible call NetBeans via command line in
order to build targets. But since NetBeans relies on external tool
ch
> May be you can share the hack as a patch on the bug tracker.
> May be it's unusable as-is but it may already contain valuable
> information for anyone wanting
> to tale over?
I have taken Michael Wild's advice and created a repository at github. I have
created a topic branch (branched off "mast
2010/5/31 Sebastian Meier :
> Hi Bill,
>
>> Can NetBeans be driven from the command line? That is a requirement for
>> getting try_compile to work.
>
> No, I don't think it is possible call NetBeans via command line in order to
> build targets. But since NetBeans relies on external tool chains li
2010/5/31 Sebastian Meier :
> Update.
>
> My allocated time slot for looking into a NetBeans generator has finished. My
> impression is that patching CMake to suit our company's needs would be fairly
> easy. I have actually gotten quite far with that.
>
> But OTOH this easy way would be merely a
Update.
My allocated time slot for looking into a NetBeans generator has finished. My
impression is that patching CMake to suit our company's needs would be fairly
easy. I have actually gotten quite far with that.
But OTOH this easy way would be merely a hack that would benefit no one but us.
Hi Bill,
> Can NetBeans be driven from the command line? That is a requirement for
> getting try_compile to work.
No, I don't think it is possible call NetBeans via command line in order to
build targets. But since NetBeans relies on external tool chains like gcc,
MinGW or CygWin, is this
On 5/28/2010 3:48 AM, Sebastian Meier wrote:
Hi Alex,
Hmm, if you plan to implement a makefile-based generator, why are all
those settings needed in the project file ?
I am not planning to implement a makefile-based generator. I just
chose cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator as a starting point becau
Hi Alex,
> Hmm, if you plan to implement a makefile-based generator, why are all
> those settings needed in the project file ?
I am not planning to implement a makefile-based generator. I just chose
cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator as a starting point because it seemed practical.
Do you think in thi
On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Sebastian Meier wrote:
> Update.
>
> After a more thorough look at the code, I believe that Alex was on the
> right track. I have copied cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator to
> cmExtraNetBeans69Generator, registered the new generator via
> AddExtraGenerator() (in cmake.cxx), and
On 26. May, 2010, at 9:35 , Sebastian Meier wrote:
> [...]
>
> Questions:
>
> - Do we already have a class or API for XML output I can use? Or will I have
> to implement a small XmlWriter class?
Looks like it doesn't exist. There's a class (cmXMLSafe) that properly
escapes/encodes strings, bu
Update.
After a more thorough look at the code, I believe that Alex was on the right
track. I have copied cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator to cmExtraNetBeans69Generator,
registered the new generator via AddExtraGenerator() (in cmake.cxx), and
removed any Eclipse-specific stuff from my new generator.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Sebastian Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on a basic generator for the NetBeans 6.9 IDE. At
> http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7632, Alex Neundorf writes:
I can't really provide any deep thoughts on implementation, but... YAY!
I desire
Hi,
I am currently working on a basic generator for the NetBeans 6.9 IDE. At
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7632, Alex Neundorf writes:
"[...] have a look at cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator.(h|cxx) and
cmExtraCodeBlocksGenerator.(h|cxx), they are executed *additionally to the
normal makefile
13 matches
Mail list logo
