Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-17 Thread K. Noel Belcourt
On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Brad King wrote: On 11/17/2010 12:15 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: On Nov 17, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: This tells CMake to print some verbose target dependency information. I bet it will report "modules" in a non-trivial connected component with a bunch

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-17 Thread Brad King
On 11/17/2010 12:15 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > On Nov 17, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Brad King wrote: >> This tells CMake to print some verbose target dependency >> information. I bet it will report "modules" in a non-trivial >> connected component with a bunch of other libraries. Please >> send me th

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-17 Thread Brad King
On 11/17/2010 11:51 AM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > It's attached. Hmm..I don't see anything jumping out at me there. On 11/17/2010 11:32 AM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > This works, but moving SUBDIRS(Modules) into it's lexical ordering > fails with the reported error. Do these libraries have circ

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-17 Thread Brad King
On 11/17/2010 11:32 AM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Brad King wrote: >> Run "make -d" to get debugging output. It is *very* verbose but can >> tell you why make chooses to run certain rules. > > It's definitely related to the presence of the SUBDIRS. Make never > con

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-17 Thread K. Noel Belcourt
Hi Brad, On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 04:52 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 04:24 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: which is the same list of libraries in these SUBDIRS commands in the top-level CMakeLists

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Brad King
On 11/16/2010 04:52 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Brad King wrote: > >> On 11/16/2010 04:24 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: >>> which is the same list of libraries in these SUBDIRS commands in the >>> top-level CMakeLists.txt file (in reverse order). There's a single

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread K. Noel Belcourt
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/11/16 Belcourt, K. Noel : On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Belcourt, K. Noel
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Eric Noulard wrote: 2010/11/16 Belcourt, K. Noel : On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Belcourt, K. Noel
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 04:24 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: which is the same list of libraries in these SUBDIRS commands in the top-level CMakeLists.txt file (in reverse order). There's a single library in each of these subdirs of the same lower-cased name.

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Brad King
On 11/16/2010 04:24 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: > which is the same list of libraries in these SUBDIRS commands in the > top-level CMakeLists.txt file (in reverse order). There's a single > library in each of these subdirs of the same lower-cased name. > > ... > SUBDIRS(Modules) > SUBDIRS(MP

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/11/16 Belcourt, K. Noel : > > On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brad King wrote: >> >>> On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: I've attached my project's top-level Makefile.  I'm trying to force all the modules in th

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Belcourt, K. Noel
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying to force all the modules in the project to build first so I created a single library

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Belcourt, K. Noel
On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brad King wrote: Hi Noel, On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying to force all the modules in the project to build first so I created a single library called modules that contains all my Fortran 90

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread Brad King
Hi Noel, On 11/16/2010 01:11 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying to force > all the modules in the project to build first so I created a single > library called modules that contains all my Fortran 90 module files. > I'm invoking the Make

[CMake] Fortran 90 modules not rebuilt

2010-11-16 Thread K. Noel Belcourt
Hi, I've attached my project's top-level Makefile. I'm trying to force all the modules in the project to build first so I created a single library called modules that contains all my Fortran 90 module files. I'm invoking the Makefile explicitly passing the modules as the target to build