Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 module support for Pathscale-3.2

2010-01-13 Thread Brad King
K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > Brad King wrote: >> Following this message is a patch series to support PathScale. Please >> try it locally and send feedback to me. If it works I'll include it to >> CMake upstream. > Yes, tested locally. Pathscale builds seems to work fine Great. I've integrated it

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 module support for Pathscale-3.2

2010-01-13 Thread Michael Wild
On 13. Jan, 2010, at 15:15 , Brad King wrote: > Hi Noel, > > Michael's explanation in his response was excellent (thanks Michael!). Thanks ;-) BTW, is your git mirror publicly available somewhere? Michael ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 module support for Pathscale-3.2

2010-01-13 Thread Brad King
Hi Noel, Michael's explanation in his response was excellent (thanks Michael!). The generalization that Michael described has been swept through many of the platform files since 2.8.0 was released. This refactoring was needed to get GNU-specific flags out of Linux.cmake before support for the Pa

Re: [CMake] Fortran 90 module support for Pathscale-3.2

2010-01-13 Thread Michael Wild
On 12. Jan, 2010, at 18:32 , K. Noel Belcourt wrote: > Hi, > > I've started running nightly cmake tests and submitting them to your > dashboard. I was hoping the nightly tests would pick up this problem I'm > having. When compiling Fortran90 code with pathscale-3.2 (pathf90), I get > this e

[CMake] Fortran 90 module support for Pathscale-3.2

2010-01-12 Thread K. Noel Belcourt
Hi, I've started running nightly cmake tests and submitting them to your dashboard. I was hoping the nightly tests would pick up this problem I'm having. When compiling Fortran90 code with pathscale-3.2 (pathf90), I get this error. pathf90 ERROR parsing -J../module: unknown flag