On Friday 22 December 2006 00:11, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Axel Roebel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
>
> Hi Axel,
Happy new year everybody!
> > obviously you've found a simpler method to achieve the same goal
> > and your tests are more complete. It seems to me, however, that it has
> > the same weakn
Axel Roebel wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
Hi Axel,
>
> obviously you've found a simpler method to achieve the same goal
> and your tests are more complete. It seems to me, however, that it has the
> same weaknesses as my current version
>
> - libperl.so is not found (at least not on Fedora and redhat
On Monday 18 December 2006 13:43, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Axel Roebel wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> > I just started to add swig support to our project
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif. The project supports
> > swig bindings to perl, python and java.
> >
> > I instantly tried the availab
Axel Roebel wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello,
> I just started to add swig support to our project
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif. The project supports
> swig bindings to perl, python and java.
>
> I instantly tried the available
> cmake modules: notably FindSWIG.cmake
> and FindPerlLibs.cmake
>
>
On Thursday 07 December 2006 22:57, Axel Roebel wrote:
> > 3. in the CMake/Modules/readme.txt, you can read:
> > "If the QUIET option is given to the command it will set the variable
> > XXX_FIND_QUIETLY to true before loading the FindXXX.cmake module."
> >
> > but you use: FIND_SWIG_QUIETLY
>
> ye
On Thursday 07 December 2006 20:37, Tristan Carel wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:36, Axel Roebel wrote:
> > > > I will test the module tomorrow.
> > > > Could you please put a RC2 of the `FindSWIG.cmake' on the bug
> > > > tracker?
>
On 12/7/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:36, Axel Roebel wrote:
> > I will test the module tomorrow.
> > Could you please put a RC2 of the `FindSWIG.cmake' on the bug tracker?
>
> That may take a day or too.
>
> I'll let you know.
There it is, called Fi
On 2006-12-07 19:41+0100 Axel Roebel wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:36, Axel Roebel wrote:
I will test the module tomorrow.
Could you please put a RC2 of the `FindSWIG.cmake' on the bug tracker?
That may take a day or too.
I'll let you know.
There it is, called FindSWIG.cmake-2
I
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:36, Axel Roebel wrote:
> > I will test the module tomorrow.
> > Could you please put a RC2 of the `FindSWIG.cmake' on the bug tracker?
>
> That may take a day or too.
>
> I'll let you know.
There it is, called FindSWIG.cmake-2
It should take care of all your comme
Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Axel Roebel wrote:
> >> 1. Look for swig executable
> >> 2. use `swig -swiglib' to get the swiglib path
> >> 3. FIND_PATH(SWIG_DIR swig.swg ${SWIG_outlib} /usr/share/swig1.3 ...)
> >
> > could you tell me why you add this path
> > /usr/share/swig1.3 ?
>
> This is a an old modu
Axel Roebel wrote:
1. Look for swig executable
2. use `swig -swiglib' to get the swiglib path
3. FIND_PATH(SWIG_DIR swig.swg ${SWIG_outlib} /usr/share/swig1.3 ...)
could you tell me why you add this path
/usr/share/swig1.3 ?
This is a an old module, the FIND_* stuff has changed a
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 00:58, Tristan Carel wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just started to add swig support to our project
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif. The project supports
> > swig bindings to perl, python and java.
> >
> > I insta
On 12/5/06, Axel Roebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just started to add swig support to our project
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif. The project supports
swig bindings to perl, python and java.
I instantly tried the available
cmake modules: notably FindSWIG.cmake
and FindPerlLibs.cmak
Hi,
I just started to add swig support to our project
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdif. The project supports
swig bindings to perl, python and java.
I instantly tried the available
cmake modules: notably FindSWIG.cmake
and FindPerlLibs.cmake
I was pretty astonished to find that these
two
14 matches
Mail list logo