Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-11-02 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/29/2009 03:23 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Bill Hoffman wrote: Will Dicharry wrote: Is there a 2.8.0 release branch where I can make that change? Make the change in head, and I will merge it into the next RC. -Bill Thanks, the change is committed. Orion, is your site on the main CMake

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/29/2009 03:05 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Just so I understand...Are you referring to alternatives in the Fedora packaging sense? -- Will Yes, so there would be a symbolic link chain as appropriate: /usr/include/H5pubconf.h -> /etc/alternatives/H5pubconf.h -> /usr/include/H5pubconf-{32,

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Will Dicharry
Bill Hoffman wrote: Will Dicharry wrote: Is there a 2.8.0 release branch where I can make that change? Make the change in head, and I will merge it into the next RC. -Bill Thanks, the change is committed. Orion, is your site on the main CMake dashboard? If not, please let me know if yo

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Will Dicharry
Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/29/2009 02:38 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/29/2009 02:31 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion, While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some patches

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/29/2009 02:38 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/29/2009 02:31 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion, While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some patches in fedora 11 cvs that you

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Will Dicharry
Orion, While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some patches in fedora 11 cvs that you have made to hdf5 code. Is it possible that your system has a bad hdf5 install? I plan on submitting the fix t

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Will Dicharry
Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/29/2009 02:31 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion, While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some patches in fedora 11 cvs that you have made to hdf5 code. Is it possible that yo

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/29/2009 02:31 PM, Will Dicharry wrote: Orion, While searching for probable causes of hdf5.h being in your /usr/include without H5pubconf.h (it is required by hdf5.h), I came across some patches in fedora 11 cvs that you have made to hdf5 code. Is it possible that your system has a bad hdf5

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Bill Hoffman
Will Dicharry wrote: Is there a 2.8.0 release branch where I can make that change? Make the change in head, and I will merge it into the next RC. -Bill ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.

Re: [CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Will Dicharry
Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm getting a test failure in FindModulesExecuteAll building 2.8.0 rc4. Is this expected? Do you really need every package installed for this to succeed, or is it something else? It looks like at least part of the problem is the FindHDF5 module: if( HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR )

[CMake] FindModulesExecuteAll test

2009-10-29 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm getting a test failure in FindModulesExecuteAll building 2.8.0 rc4. Is this expected? Do you really need every package installed for this to succeed, or is it something else? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division