> Why not LUA51_FOUND?
> Is this valid?
> I think not.
> Attached patch changes variable name LUA50_FOUND to LUA51_FOUND.
Yes, that looks like a bug. That FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS
stuff is new to me. Somebody else added it and must have done the
normal copy/paste thing/bug. I checked in t
Hi, cmakers!
I've tried to find lua through FindLua51 module, but this module seems
to be buggy.
I have lua-5.1 but after include(FindLua51) I have LUA50_FOUND "true".
Why not LUA51_FOUND?
Is this valid?
I think not.
Attached patch changes variable name LUA50_FOUND to LUA51_FOUND.
PS:
Even bette
From: Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For OpenThreads, I'm fairly close to the OpenThreads project and I've
> been working on a formal find script for CMake. (I thought one of my
> older scripts was already in the distribution too.) Our users have
> found a lot of interesting problem
On Monday 21 May 2007 21:27, E. Wing wrote:
> Hi, a few comments on your Find modules you just submitted.
>
> For OpenThreads, I'm fairly close to the OpenThreads project and I've
> been working on a formal find script for CMake. (I thought one of my
> older scripts was already in the distributio
Hi, a few comments on your Find modules you just submitted.
For OpenThreads, I'm fairly close to the OpenThreads project and I've
been working on a formal find script for CMake. (I thought one of my
older scripts was already in the distribution too.) Our users have
found a lot of interesting prob
Hello,
Here come two packages to find Lua 5.0 and Lua 5.1. They work fine for
me on on KUbuntu 7.04, YMMV.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to the amount of work, I usually need 10 days to answer)
# Find the Lua 5.0 includes and library
#
# Lua50_INCLUDE_DIR - where to f
