Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-26 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag 25 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > On 20.01.08 00:09:40, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > > > isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've > > worked with

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-25 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 00:09:40, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > Hi, > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've > worked with Andreas Schneider to make it work on his and my own system. Here

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote: ... > I have no idea how cmake's various GUI's work, but if they don't provide > a way to set CMake variables before runnint cmake, thats a bug/missing > feature in the GUI. The new Qt based GUI has this feature. Alex

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 16:05:02, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > On Jan 20, 2008 2:17 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 20.01.08 14:02:32, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > > The real problem is actually building up the "right" library names and > > allowing the user to choose between > > static/s

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
On Jan 20, 2008 2:17 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 20.01.08 14:02:32, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > > I guess there has been some difficulties with the boost version > > number. My suggestion would be to use a directory that includes the > > version number and extract it from there (e.g.

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Schneider
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > I guess there has been some difficulties with the boost version > number. My suggestion would be to use a directory that includes the > version number and extract it from there (e.g., boost_include_dir - > .../include/boost-X.YY). Then you could just have a fi

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 14:02:32, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > I guess there has been some difficulties with the boost version > number. My suggestion would be to use a directory that includes the > version number and extract it from there (e.g., boost_include_dir - > .../include/boost-X.YY). Then yo

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
On Jan 19, 2008 7:14 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > > > isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've > > worked with Andreas Schneider to make it work o

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 10:51:15, Mike Jackson wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > >> -s simply means static according to the above pages. Is static linking to >> boost not supported by the module? > > Everyone should review the following page: > > http://www.boost.org/more/getting

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Jackson
On Jan 20, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 20.01.08 13:15:47, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: On 20.01.08 11:15:33, Hendrik Sattler wrote: http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/windows.html#get-boost (slightly wrong link in there) ->

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Mike Jackson
On Jan 20, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Hendrik Sattler wrote: -s simply means static according to the above pages. Is static linking to boost not supported by the module? Everyone should review the following page: http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/windows.html#library-naming -s means you ar

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 13:15:47, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > > On 20.01.08 11:15:33, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/windows.html#get-boost > > > (slightly wrong link in there) -> > > > http://www.boost-consulting.com/pro

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > On 20.01.08 11:15:33, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > > > On 20.01.08 01:36:26, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > > > > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: >

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 11:15:33, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > > On 20.01.08 01:36:26, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > > > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > apparen

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Pakulat: > On 20.01.08 01:36:26, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > > > http://www.cmake.

[CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Cristian Adam
Also, where did you get those binary package from? Boost.org itself doesn't have any binaries available as far as I can see? Andreas http://www.boost-consulting.com/products/free ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 01:36:26, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hello, > > > > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > > > > > isn't quite perfect - actually n

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 20.01.08 01:36:26, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hello, > > > > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > > > > > isn't quite perfect - actually n

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-19 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 20 Januar 2008 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > Hi, > > Hello, > > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > > > isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've > > worked with Andreas Sch

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-19 Thread Andreas Schneider
Andreas Pakulat wrote: > Hi, Hello, > > apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 > > isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've > worked with Andreas Schneider to make it work on his and my own system. > > However thats

[CMake] FindBoost.cmake: please test

2008-01-19 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Hi, apparently the FindBoost.cmake I attached to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6257 isn't quite perfect - actually not even close. The last few days I've worked with Andreas Schneider to make it work on his and my own system. However thats just two, I'd like to get some more testing feedb