Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-18 Thread David Cole
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > On 08/18/2012 02:20 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Wild > > wrote: > > > > On 08/17/2012 05:25 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-18 Thread Michael Wild
On 08/18/2012 02:20 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Wild > wrote: > > On 08/17/2012 05:25 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rolf Eike Beer > >

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-18 Thread David Cole
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > On 08/17/2012 05:25 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rolf Eike Beer > > wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 14:17:33 schrieb Michael Wild: > > > Yes, e.g. i386 works

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-18 Thread Michael Wild
On 08/17/2012 05:25 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rolf Eike Beer > wrote: > > Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 14:17:33 schrieb Michael Wild: > > Yes, e.g. i386 works fine: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pk

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-17 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 14:17:33 schrieb Michael Wild: > > Yes, e.g. i386 works fine: > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=freefoam&arch=i386&ver=0.1.0% > > 2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1345172639 > > > > It seems that only the more

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Freitag, 17. August 2012, 14:17:33 schrieb Michael Wild: > Yes, e.g. i386 works fine: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=freefoam&arch=i386&ver=0.1.0% > 2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1345172639 > > It seems that only the more exotic (non-Intel) ones have this issue. I > forgot to mention that mi

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Wild
Yes, e.g. i386 works fine: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=freefoam&arch=i386&ver=0.1.0%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1345172639 It seems that only the more exotic (non-Intel) ones have this issue. I forgot to mention that mipsel and sparc have the same problem. Except for mipsel they are all big-

Re: [CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-17 Thread David Cole
Guess: Maybe the "+" in the build tree directory name is messing something up? Are there "+" characters in the build tree names on architectures that work? On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > Dear all > > I have this very strange case that on some hardware architectures > (p

[CMake] Failure to create CMakeFiles/libname.dir

2012-08-17 Thread Michael Wild
Dear all I have this very strange case that on some hardware architectures (powerpc, s390, s390x) CMake somehow fails to generate the target-directories (/path/to/build-tree/CMakeFiles/libname.dir). Have you ever encountered this problem? If you're curious, here's the build log of one such failu