On Thursday 18 November 2010, Adam J Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:12:42 +0100
>
> Yngve Inntjore Levinsen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:30:06 Adam J Richardson wrote:
> > > Is this a correct specification for multiple include/lib paths in
> > > environment variables? If
On Thursday 18 November 2010 12:00:52 Adam J Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:12:42 +0100
> Yngve Inntjore Levinsen wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:30:06 Adam J Richardson wrote:
> > > Is this a correct specification for multiple include/lib paths in
> > > environment vari
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:12:42 +0100
Yngve Inntjore Levinsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:30:06 Adam J Richardson wrote:
> > Is this a correct specification for multiple include/lib paths in
> > environment variables? If not, what should I use instead? Sometimes
> > it seems to work, o
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:30:06 Adam J Richardson wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Is this a correct specification for multiple include/lib paths in
> environment variables? If not, what should I use instead? Sometimes it
> seems to work, other times not...
>
> CMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/Compilers/Inclu
Hi list,
Is this a correct specification for multiple include/lib paths in
environment variables? If not, what should I use instead? Sometimes it
seems to work, other times not...
CMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/Compilers/Includes;C:/Compilers/MinGW/include
CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=C:/Compilers/Libs;C:/Compi