On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 06:50:39 +0200, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:11:19 PM Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
>> Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)?
I
>> would expect it to happen by using 'SOURCE_GROUP("Source
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:11:19 PM Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
> Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)? I
> would expect it to happen by using 'SOURCE_GROUP("Source Files" FILES
> ${SOURCES})' construct but it does not work for me (
Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)? I
would expect it to happen by using 'SOURCE_GROUP("Source Files" FILES
${SOURCES})' construct but it does not work for me (should it?).
--
Regards,
Tomasz Grobelny
__
I have the same problem. Im using 8.2.3. Please post if you find a solution.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake
On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Dan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has run into the following problem. With version
> 2.8.2 of cmake, the project generated for C::B included the tree of the src
> files starting at the base of the project. However, I've upgraded to cmake
> 2.
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if anyone has run into the following problem. With version
2.8.2 of cmake, the project generated for C::B included the tree of the src
files starting at the base of the project. However, I've upgraded to cmake
2.8.4, and the tree starts from /, which is driving me
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, David Cole wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote:
> > > That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this
> >
> > has
> >
> > > moved to line 390, but the same code is s
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote:
> > That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this
> has
> > moved to line 390, but the same code is still there...
> >
> > Looks like that whole else chunk should be rem
On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote:
> That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has
> moved to line 390, but the same code is still there...
>
> Looks like that whole else chunk should be removed. Unless somebody can say
> why it's there...?
In order to keep so
: cmake
Objet : Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets
Yes sorry, I did not precise that it was 2.6.4 source tree. Are you saying that
if I take CVS HEAD, and I compile it, I will have all the target I created in
the CodeBlocks project ?
De : David Cole [mailto:david.c
Cc : cmake
Objet : Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets
That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has
moved to line 390, but the same code is still there...
Looks like that whole else chunk should be removed. Unless somebody can say why
it's
That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has
moved to line 390, but the same code is still there...
Looks like that whole else chunk should be removed. Unless somebody can say
why it's there...?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Pierre-Julien Villoud
wrote:
> Hi ev
Hi everyone,
When using CodeBlocks MinGW Makefiles Generator, the project generated does not
contain the custom targets I created.
I don't know if this is meant to be, but I would like all the targets I created
to be in the project.
So I just commented the line 201 (the "break" statement) in
c
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2008, Félix C. Morency wrote:
> > Philip,
> >
> > You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my
> project
> > did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully.
>
>
On Monday 03 March 2008, Félix C. Morency wrote:
> Philip,
>
> You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my project
> did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully.
If you find any issues, please filel bug reports :-)
Known issue: "Compile current file" is n
Philip,
You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my project
did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully.
Thank you,
Félix C. Morency
On 3/2/08, Philip Lowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Félix C. Morency <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Félix C. Morency <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports
> CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems
> promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under
> Code
Hi,
I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports
CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems
promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under
CodeBlocks 8.02.
However, running the program (which is a command line program) from
CodeBl
18 matches
Mail list logo
