On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
> Dear CMakers,
> I want to have all my C++ headers self-sufficient (self-contained),
> i.e., a header can be included without additional includes. This is not
> only handy but also part of Google's C++ styleguide [2].
>
> It wou
argcv*/ )
{
return 0;
}
Scott
-Original Message-
From: CMake [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Grüninger
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 0:07 AM
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Check whether C++ headers are self-sufficient
Hi Andreas,
> Why do yo
Hi Andreas,
> Why do you want to use one library per header? I think, it would be
> sufficient to have one cc-file per header and one library per folder.
Then I can test also for single headers.
> Why do you worry about large build directories?
Because for slow file systems like Windows it take
I also have this implemented - in my case, the headers are fine to include
in a .cpp with just a do-nothing main function and build into an
executable, testing linking too.
https://github.com/rpavlik/util-headers/blob/master/tests/cleanbuild/CMakeLists.txt
Ryan
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM Ro
I have worked on projects where we do something fairly similar. The
significant difference is that we create only a single executable per
directory. All told is it a fairly simple and looks something like:
# Builds a source file and an executable that does nothing other than
# compile the given he
Why do you want to use one library per header? I think, it would be
sufficient to have one cc-file per header and one library per folder.
The library would simply contain all files.
Why do you worry about large build directories?
Regards,
Andreas
Am 14.03.2015 um 13:19 schrieb Christoph Grünin
Dear CMakers,
I want to have all my C++ headers self-sufficient (self-contained),
i.e., a header can be included without additional includes. This is not
only handy but also part of Google's C++ styleguide [2].
It would be great to have a make target (let's call it headercheck),
that can check for
