On Thursday 23 December 2010, Mike McQuaid wrote:
...
> > Until then, at least the mailing list has a reasonable response rate and,
> > it seems, sufficient participation from knowledgeable folks willing to
> > pitch in and answer. So... if you're confused about something, please ask
> > here. We (
On 23 December 2010 22:05, David Cole wrote:
> Much easier on the eyes, much nicer in every respect except there's one
> extra file in your source tree now. Small price to pay for readability and
> future maintainability...
Agreed. I think what would be even nicer would be to be able to do
common
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:59 PM, KC Jones wrote:
> > Thanks for your comments and questions. May we quote you on that? ("cmake
> is elegant in the extreme ... great tool")
>
> Of course. Since all the code I work with is published on multiple OSes,
> cmake is a godsend. I'm actively working on
> Thanks for your comments and questions. May we quote you on that? ("cmake is
> elegant in the extreme ... great tool")
Of course. Since all the code I work with is published on multiple OSes, cmake
is a godsend. I'm actively working on replacing as much of our legacy build
methods with cmak
On 12/23/2010 9:59 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
A few questions:
What platforms does it need to be tested on?
At least one. The important thing is that it actually has a test, that
will be run with make test on CMake after the code is merged into CMake.
The dashboards will take care of testing it
On 23 December 2010 14:47, Michael Wild wrote:
> Well, I also did some contributions to homebrew, and I have to agree
> that patches get picked up really quickly. There's one big "but",
> though: Writing a formula is fairly simple. Just copy an existing
> formula that is similar to your favourite
On 23 December 2010 14:30, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Something like this perhaps:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/mailing.html
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Excuse my extreme ignorance, I had no idea that existed.
Subscribing!
> 1. you have some code.
>
On 12/23/2010 02:44 PM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
> On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Cole wrote:
>> How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
>> easy? Specifics, please.
>
> Firstly, http://producingoss.com/ is a great read.
>
> Specifically though, Homebrew is pretty muc
Hi Mike and all,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 21:58, Mike McQuaid wrote:
> On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole wrote:
> I think the main problem is that you make it very hard for people to
> contribute. KDE and Homebrew (two other open-source projects I've
> written a lot of code for over the year
On 12/23/2010 8:44 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Cole wrote:
How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
easy? Specifics, please.
I think for you guys general guidelines on what patches would/wouldn't
be accepted would be a good start.
On 23 December 2010 13:24, David Cole wrote:
> How do we make it very hard? What about KDE and Homebrew make this very
> easy? Specifics, please.
Firstly, http://producingoss.com/ is a great read.
Specifically though, Homebrew is pretty much the golden child of
encouraging external contribution.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Johan Björk wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Cole wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
>>>
>>> I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote:
> On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole wrote:
> > Neither do we:
> > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10067
>
> > As always, as developers we find ourselves constantly working to improve
> > what we have: fixing bugs, implementing ne
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:43 PM, David Cole wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones wrote:
>
>> Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
>>
>> I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8) on both Mac (10.6.40 and
>> Linux (Ubuntu 10.04).
>> The app de
On 23 December 2010 12:43, David Cole wrote:
> Neither do we:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10067
> As always, as developers we find ourselves constantly working to improve
> what we have: fixing bugs, implementing new features, answering questions on
> the mailing list, blogging/co
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, KC Jones wrote:
> Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
>
> I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8) on both Mac (10.6.40 and
> Linux (Ubuntu 10.04).
> The app depends on some libraries (Qt4.6 (no plugins) and a customized
On 12/22/2010 11:24 PM, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:15:07PM -0500, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:57:11 -0800
>> From: KC Jones
>> Subject: [CMake] CPack 101
>
>> And I just don't seem to get it. I know this is
On 22 December 2010 22:24, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> To put it simply, I was just not happy the entire time while
> trying to implement this and not finding any satisfying (well-crafted)
> solution,
> only ugly, very bad or semi-failing workarounds.
> That kind of work should be _fun_, especially whe
To start with, Charm might be a good example of how to use CPack, it's
an internal tool we've written in Qt and use CPack to do all the
packaging:
https://github.com/KDAB/Charm
Check particularly the CMakeLists.txt and Charm/CMakeLists.txt for all
the CPack-relevant logic.
On 22 December 2010 17
On 22.12.10 23:24:35, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> - there's no cmake -E rename available (perhaps for reasons of build rule
> atomicity)
Hmm my cmake -E help tells me different:
...
rename oldname newname- rename a file or directory (on one volume)
...
This is cmake version 2.8.2.20100804-ga
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:15:07PM -0500, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:57:11 -0800
> From: KC Jones
> Subject: [CMake] CPack 101
> And I just don't seem to get it. I know this is very possible. I know this
> is my own problem, first and foremo
Feeling really uneasy about putting this out there, but here goes...
I have an app that I am building with cmake (2.8) on both Mac (10.6.40 and
Linux (Ubuntu 10.04).
The app depends on some libraries (Qt4.6 (no plugins) and a customized build of
Poco).
I want to generate a DragAndDrop DMG instal
22 matches
Mail list logo
