On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Beside that, I played around with it a bit.
> If 2.8.12 is required, it errors out, as documented.
>
> If I use 2.8.12 and require 2.8.11:
[snip]
> So this seems to behave differently than in 2.8.11 even if 2.8.11 is required
> (and so the polic
On Thursday 22 August 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Robert Maynard wrote:
> >> Introduced CMake Policy 21:
> >> It is now an error to use relative paths to include_directories.
> >
> > Why is this necessary ?
> > The documentation for this
Stephen is correct the issue is with the incorrect release notes that
I made. I will be updating the blog post with the corrected text, and
will make the change is included for all future 2.8.12 releases.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
>>
>> On
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Robert Maynard wrote:
>> Introduced CMake Policy 21:
>> It is now an error to use relative paths to include_directories.
>
> Why is this necessary ?
> The documentation for this policy says:
> "The base path for such relative entries is
On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Robert Maynard wrote:
> Introduced CMake Policy 21:
> It is now an error to use relative paths to include_directories.
Why is this necessary ?
The documentation for this policy says:
"The base path for such relative entries is not well defined."
I don't understand t
